Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ethanaubuchon/dossier-tradecraft --skill publish-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ethanaubuchon/dossier-tradecraftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ethanaubuchon/dossier-tradecraft/publish-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ethanaubuchon/dossier-tradecraft/publish-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ethanaubuchon/dossier-tradecraft/publish-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ethanaubuchon/dossier-tradecraft/publish-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ethanaubuchon/dossier-tradecraft/publish-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.00766 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00383 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
publish-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 43 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Publish PR
The finalize step of /implement's repo path: collapse the review-iteration commit noise into one clean commit, then mark the draft PR ready for humans. Runs after cleanup-artifacts (so a tracked plan-file deletion folds into the squashed commit).
The squash is a non-interactive local rewrite — git rebase -i isn't available in this harness, and isn't needed.
Input
- branch — the current feature branch (committed; reviewed in its draft PR).
- commit message — the final squashed-commit message. The recipe sources it from the
plan-file(story ref + change summary) beforecleanup-artifactsdeletes that file. - PR ref — the draft PR to mark ready (from
open-draft-pr).
Steps
- Squash the branch to one commit:
Soft-reset to the branch point keeps the branch's work staged;git reset --soft "$(git merge-base origin/main HEAD)" git add -A git commit -m "<commit message>"git add -Athen folds in working-tree changes the index doesn't yet reflect — notablycleanup-artifacts' plan-file deletion, so a tracked plan file isn't re-committed into the squash (thereset --softindex still holds it otherwise). No-op for the gitignored default. One commit then collapses the WIP + review-feedback commits. The goal is eliminating review-iteration noise, not single-commit dogma — squash-to-one is just the simplest mechanism that guarantees no feedback-churn commits survive. If the branch has no changes vs the merge-base, there's nothing to finalize — treat it as a no-op rather than lettinggit commiterror on an empty index. (git add -Aassumes the finalize tree is clean apart fromcleanup-artifacts' deletions; stray untracked scratch/build files would otherwise be swept into the squash.) - Force-push the rewritten branch with an explicit refspec:
git push --force-with-lease origin <branch>(explicit so it doesn't depend on a configured upstream; the lease guards against clobbering an unexpected remote update; safe on a solo feature branch). - Mark the PR ready:
gh pr ready <PR ref>.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 43 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 8b0f476f33a6
publish-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository ethanaubuchon/dossier-tradecraft (3 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 766 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
git
Granular git operations with conventional commits - stage, commit, push, PR, merge. Auto-splits commits by type/scope, blocks on secrets, delegates verbose work to git-manager subagent. GitHub CLI conventions: --body-file for PR bodies, treat gh pr checks exit 8 (pending) as retry not failure, guard run-id assignment…
changelog-gen
A changelog generator that turns Git history into a version-by-version record of project changes. A changelog is a readable summary of new features, fixes, breaking changes, documentation, and other updates.
changelog-rules
Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by /create-changelog and /update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.
ship
Commit, push, and optionally create or update a PR for the current staged changes. Use when the user asks to "ship", "ship it", "ship changes", "commit push and PR", or "ship this".
release
Cut and publish a full stable NAC release after main, release-PR, and publication CI pass. Use when a maintainer asks for a stable version bump, tag, or GitHub Release. Never use for release candidates; NAC RC releases are automated.
stage
Stage implementation changes for commit with precise file selection. Use when the user asks to "stage changes", "stage files", "add files to staging", or "prepare changes for commit".