Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add EthanYoQ/Skill-hub --skill contract-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EthanYoQ/Skill-hubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ethanyoq/skill-hub/contract-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ethanyoq/skill-hub/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ethanyoq/skill-hub/contract-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ethanyoq/skill-hub/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ethanyoq/skill-hub/contract-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.01249 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00624 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00250 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
contract-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Contract Review Skill
Overview
This skill performs contract reviews by adding comments only (no edits to the original text). It follows a three-layer review (basic, business, legal) and generates:
- Annotated contract (.docx)
- Contract summary (.docx)
- Consolidated review opinion (.docx)
- Business flowchart (Mermaid + rendered image)
Language rule: detect the contract’s dominant language and output all generated content (comments, summary, opinion, flowchart text) in that language. Use the guidance in references/language.md.
Workflow
- Unpack the contract (.docx) for XML operations
- Read contract text (pandoc or XML)
- Execute three-layer review
- Add comments to the document
- Generate contract summary
- Generate consolidated opinion
- Generate business flowchart and render image
- Repack to .docx
Output Naming
- Output directory:
审核结果:{ContractName}for Chinese orReview_Result_{ContractName}for English - Reviewed contract:
{ContractName}_审核版.docxfor Chinese or{ContractName}_Reviewed.docxfor English - Review report:
审核报告.txtfor Chinese orReview_Report.txtfor English
Comment Principles
- Comments only: do not modify the original text or formatting
- Precise anchoring: comment should target specific clauses/paragraphs
- Structured content: each comment includes issue type, risk reason, and revision suggestion
- Risk level: carried by reviewer name; do not include a “risk level” line in comment body
- Output language: use labels in the contract’s language (see
references/language.md)
Comment example (English):
[Issue Type] Payment Terms
[Risk Reason] The total amount is stated as USD 100,000 in Section 3.2, but the payment clause lists USD 1,000,000 in Section 5.1. This inconsistency may cause disputes.
[Revision Suggestion] Align the total amount across clauses and clarify whether tax is included.
Review Standards
Use the three-layer review model and the detailed checklist in references/checklist.md.
What ships with it
26 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- LICENSE.txt 11 KB
- references/checklist.md 5.3 KB
- references/examples.md 5.5 KB
- references/flowchart.md 1.8 KB
- references/language.md 2.0 KB
- references/opinion.md 1.3 KB
- references/summary.md 2.8 KB
- references/technical.md 2.7 KB
- scripts/__init__.py 50 B runs code
- scripts/contract_analyzer.py 9.2 KB runs code
- scripts/document.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/error_handling.py 16 KB runs code
- scripts/mermaid_renderer.py 6.9 KB runs code
- scripts/ooxml/__init__.py 189 B runs code
- scripts/ooxml/pack.py 3.5 KB runs code
- scripts/ooxml/unpack.py 1.1 KB runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validate.py 1.7 KB runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validation/__init__.py 433 B runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validation/base.py 1.5 KB runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validation/docx.py 311 B runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validation/pptx.py 274 B runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validation/redlining.py 217 B runs code
- scripts/opinion_renderer.py 4.2 KB runs code
- scripts/summary_renderer.py 9.1 KB runs code
- scripts/utilities.py 3.1 KB runs code
- scripts/workflow.py 59 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 137 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A f7639c1f845e
contract-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository EthanYoQ/Skill-hub (9 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 1,249 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
partnership-doc
Produce a 31C partnership document (MOU, Letter of Intent, or term sheet) using the locked corporate template. Legal-adjacent document defining mutual obligations, governance, territory, exclusivity, and confidentiality between 31 Concept and a counterparty. Renders to PDF + DOCX. Trigger when the user says "MOU"…
official-doc
Produce a 31C official document (board resolution, formal notice, letter of position, certificate of authority) using the locked corporate template. Authoritative voice, declarative language, reference numbering, and official seal block. Renders to PDF + DOCX. Trigger when the user says "board resolution", "formal…
legal-document-drafting-formatting-alessandro-dardano
Produces properly-formatted legal documents in Word (.docx). The user provides the substantive content (instructions, attached files, project knowledge); the skill handles document architecture and formatting. No precedent or template required Seven document families: agreements, corporate documents, litigation…
gdpr-privacy-notice-eu-oliver-schmidt-prietz
Draft GDPR/DSGVO-compliant privacy notices as .docx for any EU/EEA jurisdiction and audience. Use when user asks to create a privacy policy/notice, mentions "Datenschutzerklärung", "politique de confidentialité", "privacy notice", needs Art. 13/14 disclosures, AI Act transparency, cookie policy, or notices for…
ambiguity-report
Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page interactive site, a Microsoft Word document, a PowerPoint deck, or a LaTeX/PDF. Use whenever a user has a stress-test result…
eu-ai-act-report-oliver-schmidt-prietz
Generates a formal, structured AI Act compliance assessment report suitable for legal files, audit trails, and regulatory inquiries. This skill should be used when the user asks to "generate an AI Act report", "create a compliance assessment report", "document the AI Act analysis", "create a Prüfbericht", "export as…