analysis-revision

analysis-revision is a skill for Claude Code from etoyama/insight-blueprint. It costs 68 tokens per session (2,147 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guided workflow for revising an analysis design after reviewers leave comments. It reads review feedback, tracks each comment, and helps address the comments one by one.

In plain words
What is it for?
Checking a design marked for revision, recording progress for each reviewer comment, fixing the issues, and preparing the design for resubmission.
Why use it?
It prevents review comments from being lost or handled inconsistently, especially when revision work is paused and resumed.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md.

Part of the insight-blueprint plugin — 10 skills, 2 MCP servers shipped together

Good fit Checking a design marked for revision, recording progress for each reviewer comment, fixing the issues, and preparing the design for resubmission.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/etoyama/insight-blueprint/analysis-revision
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add etoyama/insight-blueprint --skill analysis-revision
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/etoyama/insight-blueprint

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install insight-blueprint, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 10 skills, 2 MCP servers.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analysis-revision

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/etoyama/insight-blueprint/analysis-revision/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/etoyama/insight-blueprint/analysis-revision)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/etoyama/insight-blueprint/analysis-revision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/etoyama/insight-blueprint/analysis-revision/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for analysis-revision

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/etoyama/insight-blueprint/analysis-revision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/etoyama/insight-blueprint/analysis-revision.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 68 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,147 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00068 $0.02147
Opus 5 $0.00034 $0.01073
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00429
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00215

Measured 9d ago against content hash 6af08d00ccab, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analysis-revision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/analysis-revision/SKILL.md · 227 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 227 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/analysis-revision — Structured Review Revision

Guides the user through a structured revision workflow for an analysis design that has received review comments. Reads review feedback via MCP, creates a persistent tracking file for per-comment progress, and helps address each comment through interactive dialogue.

When to Use

  • Design status is revision_requested and review comments need to be addressed
  • Resuming a previously interrupted revision session
  • Systematically working through all reviewer feedback before re-submitting

When NOT to Use

  • Creating a new design from scratch (-> /analysis-design)
  • Recording reasoning during active analysis (-> /analysis-journal)
  • Structured reflection and conclusion (-> /analysis-reflection)
  • Design is not in revision_requested status

Workflow

Phase 1: Situation Assessment

  1. If $ARGUMENTS contains a design ID (e.g., "FP-H01"), use it directly. Otherwise, call list_analysis_designs(status="revision_requested") and ask the user to select.

  2. get_analysis_design(design_id) -- load the design.

  3. Status check: If status != "revision_requested", display an error and exit:

    このデザイン ({design_id}) は revision_requested 状態ではない (現在: {status})。
    レビューで修正依頼が出た後にこのスキルを使おう。
    
  4. get_review_comments(design_id) -- get all review batches.

  5. Batch selection (important -- do NOT just pick the newest batch overall):

    • Filter the returned batches to only those where status_after == "revision_requested"
    • From the filtered set, pick the one with the newest created_at
    • This is the target batch for this revision session
  6. If no qualifying batch found (all batches have status_after != "revision_requested"):

    revision_requested に対応するレビューバッチが見つからない。
    レビューが WebUI 経由で提出されているか確認しよう。
    

    Exit.

  7. Display situation summary:

    -- Revision: {design_id} --
    Title: {title}
    Status: {status}
    Target batch: {batch.id} ({batch.created_at})
    Reviewer: {batch.reviewer}
    Comments: {len(batch.comments)} items
    

Read the full file on GitHub · 227 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 227 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 6af08d00ccab

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analysis-revision is a skill published in the GitHub repository etoyama/insight-blueprint (0 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 2,147 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.