Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/etr/groundwork/design-productnpx skills add etr/groundwork --skill design-productgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/etr/groundworkWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.03915 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01958 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00783 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00392 |
Grade A, and why
design-product scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 387 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Product Design Skill
Interactive workflow for iteratively designing and documenting product requirements in EARS format.
Workflow Overview
- Understand - Clarify the feature/change request through targeted questions
- Design - Draft EARS requirements and check for contradictions
- Approve - Present draft for user approval
- Commit - Edit the PRD document when requirements are approved
- Next Step - Ask user what to do next (architecture, UX, or another feature)
If you are in plan mode, you MUST still complete the full workflow (Steps 0–4). Your plan output MUST describe ONLY the PRD file edits from Step 4.
- Which file to create or edit
- Where to insert the new feature block
- The EARS requirements content
Pre-flight: Model Recommendation
Your current effort level is {{effort_level}}.
Skip this step silently if effort is high, xhigh, or max (the scale is low < medium < high < xhigh < max, so xhigh and max are already above high) AND you are Opus (1M context).
If effort is low or medium (i.e. below high), you MUST show the recommendation prompt — regardless of model.
If you are not Opus (1M context), you MUST show the recommendation prompt - regardless of model.
Otherwise → use AskUserQuestion:
{
"questions": [{
"question": "Do you want to switch? Cross-spec contradiction detection across PRD, architecture, and design system benefits from deeper reasoning.\n\nTo switch: cancel, run `/model opus[1m]` and `/effort high`, then re-invoke this skill.",
"header": "Recommended: Opus (1M context) at high effort",
"options": [
{ "label": "Continue" },
{ "label": "Cancel — I'll switch first" }
],
"multiSelect": false
}]
}
If the user selects "Cancel — I'll switch first": output the switching commands above and stop. Do not proceed with the skill.
Step 0: Resolve Project Context
Before anything else, resolve the project context:
- Monorepo check: Does
.groundwork.ymlexist at the repo root?- If yes → Is
{{project_name}}non-empty?- If empty → Invoke
Skill(skill="groundwork:select-project")to select a project, then restart this skill. - If set → Project is
{{project_name}}, specs at{{specs_dir}}/.
- If empty → Invoke
- If no → Continue to item 3.
- If yes → Is
- CWD mismatch check (monorepo only):
- Skip if not in monorepo mode or if the project was just selected in item 1 above.
- If CWD is the repo root → fine, proceed.
- Check which project's path CWD falls inside (compare against all projects in
.groundwork.yml). - If CWD is inside the selected project's path → fine, proceed.
- If CWD is inside a different project's path → warn via
AskUserQuestion:"You're working from
<cwd>(inside [cwd-project]), but the selected Groundwork project is [selected-project] ([selected-project-path]/). What would you like to do?"- "Switch to [cwd-project]"
- "Stay with [selected-project]"
If the user switches, invoke
Skill(skill="groundwork:select-project").
- If CWD doesn't match any project → proceed without warning (shared directory).
- Check
{{specs_dir}}/: Does a specs directory exist?- If yes → Single-project repo, proceed normally.
- If no → Ask the user: "Is this a single-project repo or a monorepo with multiple projects?"
- Single project → Proceed normally (specs will be created at
{{specs_dir}}/) - Monorepo → Invoke
Skill(skill="groundwork:setup-repo")to create.groundwork.yml, then continue.
- Single project → Proceed normally (specs will be created at
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 387 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 6ae74617a680
design-product is a skill published in the GitHub repository etr/groundwork (42 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 3,915 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…