perf-review

perf-review is a skill for Claude Code from eugeniosegala/claude-connoisseur. It costs 20 tokens per session (896 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code review focused on speed and resource use. It looks for inefficient algorithms, repeated database or network work, unnecessary memory use, and avoidable sequential operations.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review selected files for complexity, batching, caching, data structures, memory, concurrency, and input/output efficiency.
Why use it?
It helps find code that becomes slow, expensive, or difficult to scale as data and usage grow.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: agent in frontmatter.

Part of the claude-connoisseur plugin — 13 skills, 2 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to review selected files for complexity, batching, caching, data structures, memory, concurrency, and input/output efficiency.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/eugeniosegala/claude-connoisseur/perf-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add eugeniosegala/claude-connoisseur --skill perf-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eugeniosegala/claude-connoisseur

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install claude-connoisseur, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 13 skills, 2 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for perf-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eugeniosegala/claude-connoisseur/perf-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eugeniosegala/claude-connoisseur/perf-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eugeniosegala/claude-connoisseur/perf-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eugeniosegala/claude-connoisseur/perf-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for perf-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eugeniosegala/claude-connoisseur/perf-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eugeniosegala/claude-connoisseur/perf-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 896 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.00896
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00448
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00179
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00090

Measured 12d ago against content hash 4e834fcd1947, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

perf-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/perf-review/SKILL.md · 67 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Performance Review

Analyse the specified files for performance issues and provide actionable improvement suggestions.

Files and instructions: $ARGUMENTS

What to review

  • Algorithmic complexity: inefficient loops, nested iterations that could be flattened, O(n^2) or worse patterns that could be reduced, unnecessary repeated computations
  • Batching: operations that could be grouped (database queries, API calls, file I/O) instead of executed one at a time in a loop
  • Caching: repeated expensive computations or lookups that would benefit from memoisation or caching, missing cache invalidation
  • Data structures: use of the wrong data structure for the access pattern (e.g. linear search in a list where a set or map would be O(1), arrays where linked lists are better or vice versa)
  • Memory: unnecessary allocations, large objects held longer than needed, string concatenation in loops, unbounded collections, missing pagination
  • Concurrency: sequential operations that could run in parallel, blocking calls on the main thread, missing async/await, thread-safety issues that force unnecessary serialisation
  • I/O efficiency: chatty network calls, missing connection pooling, unbuffered reads/writes, missing streaming for large payloads
  • Lazy vs eager evaluation: eagerly loading or computing data that may never be used, missing short-circuit evaluation, loading entire datasets when only a subset is needed
  • Hot paths: performance-critical code paths where micro-optimisations matter — unnecessary object creation, redundant type conversions, avoidable regex compilation
  • Language-specific antipatterns: idioms that are idiomatic but slow in the specific language (e.g. reflection in Java, dynamic dispatch where static would suffice, unintentional boxing)

How to interpret arguments

The arguments are free-form and flexible. They may contain:

  • File references of any type and in any format: @file.ts, file.py, main.go, utils.go, script.sh handler.rb
  • Additional natural language instructions alongside file references, such as:
    • "and also review the files imported by the specified file"
    • "focus only on database query performance"
    • "this handles 10k requests per second"
    • "we're seeing high memory usage in production"

Read the full file on GitHub · 67 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 67 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 4e834fcd1947

Subscribe to this mod's changes

perf-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository eugeniosegala/claude-connoisseur (9 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 896 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

adversarial-reviewer

Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.

emdash-cms/emdash · 71 tokens

gsd-ns-review

Route to the appropriate quality / review skill based on the user's intent. gsd-code-review-fix was absorbed by gsd-code-review --fix in #2790.

open-gsd/gsd-core · 16 tokens

issue

Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace · 115 tokens

gitnexus

A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins · 58 tokens

cleanup-code-inspections

Reduce technical debt and improve code quality by systematically resolving static analysis warnings.

flutter/flutter-intellij · 19 tokens

sonarqube-mcp

Provides SonarQube and SonarCloud integration patterns via the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. Enables quality gate monitoring, issue discovery and triaging, pre-push code analysis, and rule education directly in the agent workflow. Use when the user wants to check quality gates, search for Sonar issues, analyze…

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · 127 tokens