Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add evanca/flutter-ai-rules --skill mocktailgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/evanca/flutter-ai-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/evanca/flutter-ai-rules/mocktail)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/evanca/flutter-ai-rules/mocktail"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/evanca/flutter-ai-rules/mocktail/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/evanca/flutter-ai-rules/mocktail"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/evanca/flutter-ai-rules/mocktail.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00773 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00309 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
mocktail scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mocktail Skill
This skill defines how to correctly use the mocktail package for mocking in Dart and Flutter tests.
1. Mock vs. Fake vs. Real Object
| Use | When |
|---|---|
| Real object | Prefer over mocks when practical. |
Fake (extends Fake) |
Lightweight custom implementation; override only the methods you need. Prefer over mocks when you don't need interaction verification. |
Mock (extends Mock) |
Only when you need to verify interactions (call counts, arguments) or stub dynamic responses. |
- Never add
@overridemethods or implementations to a class extendingMock. - Only use mocks if your test has
verifyassertions; otherwise prefer real or fake objects.
2. Creating Mocks
class MockMyService extends Mock implements MyService {}
class FakeMyEvent extends Fake implements MyEvent {}
No code generation required — unlike Mockito, Mocktail uses noSuchMethod at runtime.
3. Registering Fallback Values
Register fallback values before using custom types with argument matchers. Do this in setUpAll or at the top of your test:
setUpAll(() {
registerFallbackValue(FakeMyEvent());
});
- Required for non-nullable custom types used with
any(),captureAny(), orcaptureThat(). - Register fallback values for any custom type used with argument matchers.
4. Stubbing
final mock = MockMyService();
// Return a value
when(() => mock.fetchData()).thenReturn('result');
// Throw an error
when(() => mock.fetchData()).thenThrow(Exception('error'));
// Dynamic/async response
when(() => mock.fetchData()).thenAnswer((_) async => 'result');
// Future<void>
when(() => mock.doWork()).thenAnswer((_) async {});
- Always stub async methods (returning
FutureorFuture<void>) withthenAnswer. - Stub every method you expect to be called, even if it's not the focus of your test.
5. Named Parameters
Always include all named parameters in both when and verify calls. Use any(named: 'paramName') for those you don't care about:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 73034a7f151d
mocktail is a skill published in the GitHub repository evanca/flutter-ai-rules (653 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 773 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
component-creation
Step-by-step workflow for creating accessible, tested UI components. Use when the user asks to create a new UI component.
iterate-agent-harness
Turn an agent failure (premature stop, false completion, gamed check, missed file) into a rule, hook, or CI guard with a regression test. Use when "the agent stopped early again", "it gamed the test", or "add a guard so this doesn't recur".
test-create
Generate test cases for code. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or verifying acceptance criteria.
coverage-improvement
Systematic workflow for identifying coverage gaps and writing missing tests. Use when coverage is below target or the user asks to improve coverage.
debug-issue
Structured workflow for debugging a reported or reproduced issue. Use when the user asks to debug a bug, find root cause, or fix a failing scenario.
pn-testing-strategy
Testing strategy and pyramid. Unit/integration/E2E ratio, Vitest vs Playwright vs MSW, contract testing, and test-environment setup. Use when defining or reviewing a project's testing approach.