Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add event4u-app/agent-config --skill dpa-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/event4u-app/agent-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/event4u-app/agent-config/dpa-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/event4u-app/agent-config/dpa-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/event4u-app/agent-config/dpa-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/event4u-app/agent-config/dpa-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/event4u-app/agent-config/dpa-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02313 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01156 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00463 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00231 |
Grade A, and why
dpa-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
dpa-review
When to use
- A counterparty sends a DPA (their paper or yours) and the question is where the GDPR Art. 28 obligations are met, partial, or missing — before an attorney spends time on it.
- An existing processing relationship is being re-papered (new sub-processor chain, new transfer route, new scope) and the Art. 28 surface must be re-walked.
- You need a structured gap frame and the open questions an attorney must resolve — not a redline and not a verdict.
Do NOT use for clause-level redlining of a general contract (route to contract-review), for the regulatory-regime delta read in isolation (route to privacy-review), or for the classification / retention / transfer-mechanism operational surface (route to data-handling-judgment). This skill walks the Art. 28 agreement; those skills produce the inputs it cites.
Procedure
Step 0: Establish jurisdiction and refuse if out of scope
- Read the DPA's governing-law / jurisdiction clause. Tag the output
Jurisdiction: EUorJurisdiction: DE. - If the DPA is governed by a non-EU/DE regime with no GDPR nexus (e.g. a pure US state-privacy regime), refuse the gap review: say "consult licensed local counsel". Note as an open question that GDPR may still apply extraterritorially under Art. 3 (EU-established controller/processor, or offering to / monitoring EU data subjects) — for the attorney to confirm.
- No default positions ship. Read acceptable values (sub-processor notice window, audit frequency, liability cap, breach-notice deadline) from
legal-practice-profile. Until configured, every such value is a[configure]placeholder in the output, not a guess.
Step 1: Fix the role — controller or processor
The Art. 28 reading forks on which side you are.
- You are the controller → you instruct. Read whether the agreement binds the processor to your instructions, confidentiality, security, sub-processor flow-down, assistance, deletion, and audit rights for you.
- You are the processor → you are bound. Read whether the obligations imposed are deliverable as written (audit cadence you can sustain, deletion you can actually perform, sub-processor flow-down you can pass down).
- Joint / unclear → flag it as the first open question; Art. 26 joint-controllership changes the frame.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 131 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 79072eb3b359
dpa-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository event4u-app/agent-config (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,313 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
telnyx-email-suppressions-curl
Manage email suppressions (blocks), import and export suppression lists, and manage unsubscribe groups. Use for deliverability compliance and bounce handling.
healthcare-providers-verify
Validates practitioner credentials and license status against the NPI registry. Cross-references specialties, credentials, and practice addresses against official records. Returns Verified / Partially Verified / Unverified / Flagged per practitioner with mismatch details and source URLs. Triggers: "verify these…
python-packaging-license-finder
Use this skill to deterministically find license information for Python packages by checking PyPI metadata first, then falling back to Git repository LICENSE files using shallow cloning.
patent-review
Multi-round cyclic rigorous review of Chinese patent technical disclosure documents. Supports multi-dimension review (data flow closure, terminology consistency, state transition, formula completeness, error code routing, text-diagram consistency), round-by-round convergence, and optional auto-fix (default off, severe…
template-redacted-report
Redacted release-report exemplar for classification ceilings, source protection, source-safe ledgers, reviewer gates, and mosaic-risk checks.
disclosure-page-generator
When the user wants to create, optimize, or audit an affiliate, sponsor, or paid partnership disclosure page. Also use when the user mentions "disclosure," "affiliate disclosure," "sponsored content," "FTC disclosure," or "paid partnership." For sitewide page planning, use website-structure.