Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/competitive-intelligencenpx skills add Everyone-Needs-A-Copilot/claude-copilot --skill competitive-intelligencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Everyone-Needs-A-Copilot/claude-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/competitive-intelligence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/competitive-intelligence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/competitive-intelligence.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.02944 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.01472 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00589 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
competitive-intelligence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to competitive-intelligence — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 402 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitive Intelligence
Research your competitors extensively and generate an interactive HTML battlecard you can use in deals. The output is a self-contained artifact with clickable competitor tabs and an overall comparison matrix.
How It Works
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ALWAYS (works standalone via web search) │
│ ✓ Competitor product deep-dive: features, pricing, positioning │
│ ✓ Recent releases: what they've shipped in last 90 days │
│ ✓ Your company releases: what you've shipped to counter │
│ ✓ Differentiation matrix: where you win vs. where they win │
│ ✓ Sales talk tracks: how to position against each competitor │
│ ✓ Landmine questions: expose their weaknesses naturally │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ OUTPUT: Interactive HTML Battlecard │
│ ✓ Comparison matrix overview │
│ ✓ Clickable tabs for each competitor │
│ ✓ Dark theme, professional styling │
│ ✓ Self-contained HTML file — share or host anywhere │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUPERCHARGED (when you connect your tools) │
│ + CRM: Win/loss data, competitor mentions in closed deals │
│ + Docs: Existing battlecards, competitive playbooks │
│ + Chat: Internal intel, field reports from colleagues │
│ + Transcripts: Competitor mentions in customer calls │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Getting Started
When you run this skill, I'll ask for context:
Required:
- What company do you work for? (or I'll detect from your email)
- Who are your main competitors? (1-5 names)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 402 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 1153f80c8fca
competitive-intelligence is a skill published in the GitHub repository Everyone-Needs-A-Copilot/claude-copilot (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 2,944 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competitive-intelligence, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cadence-first
Meta-orchestrator: assigns skill-chain cadence per block (Tier 1/2/3) via Q1-Q6 rules. Reads target taskblocks + task.md, writes cadence-decisions-{R}.md artifact. Standalone (executor invokes) or Batch (generator hand-off). Use when: deciding cadence for a batch of blocks, generator hand-off from decomposition skills.
ship-first
Final task completion protocol: report → user-note → deploy → smoke test → close? → guide? → routing.db → propagate → STATUS → sessions. Invoked from fast-track and pipeline flows after task execution, not directly by the user. Use when: invoked after the execute step of a fast-track or pipeline task.
ui-ai-first
Final audit of a large task before closure — finds which operations are available only via code / curl / SQL and decides per each: automate with a skill or AI agent (A) or create a UI task (B). Protects against invisible usability debt. Walks through each implemented block: reads task.md + reports + guides + code →…
decision-first
Makes an architectural / project / scope decision using a 5-part model INSTEAD of asking the user. Structure: 🎯 Decision / Why / 🛡 Security / 📈 Scalability / Alternatives / Plain-language analogy. 1 question = 1 atomic artifact. Use when: the agent is about to ask an architectural / scope question…
library-first
Mandatory protocol before executing any fast-track task. Analyzes the task, builds a table: what we do / where it comes from / how many lines of code. Principle: maximum reuse of existing libraries and components, minimum new code. Waits for explicit user approval — does nothing until confirmed. Use when: fast-track…
fixture-new
Creates a parity fixture — the frozen scenario plus the contract its output must satisfy. Asks which skill and case, what shape the run must produce, and writes input.md and expect.yml. Ends by proving the new fixture actually fails on an empty directory. A fixture that passes when nothing ran is worse than no…