Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add evmts/tevm --skill repair-rpc-regressiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/evmts/tevmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/evmts/tevm/repair-rpc-regression)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/evmts/tevm/repair-rpc-regression"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/evmts/tevm/repair-rpc-regression.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00600 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00300 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00120 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
repair-rpc-regression scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Repair a JSON-RPC regression
Input: an observed bug with actual and expected wire values, optionally the method name and the protocol/reference behavior.
This lane repairs a regression; it does not add unrelated methods or refactor a namespace. Work in this order:
- Locate the nearest public boundary that reproduces the report: the JSON-RPC dispatcher, HTTP/WebSocket/IPC server, or memory client. Trace inward through the response type, native engine request, and conversion helper. Read the equivalent neighboring method before editing.
- Write the smallest focused test first and run it against the unmodified
implementation. Record that it fails for the reported reason. Use real
createTevmNode()/createMemoryClient()objects and recorded RPC fixtures; do not mock TEVM objects. - Pin the expected behavior to the supplied reference. If no reference was supplied, use a repository conformance fixture or an established neighboring method. If those disagree or do not define the edge case, stop and report the ambiguity rather than inventing Ethereum semantics.
- Make the minimum implementation change. Review the complete contract matrix
for this method even when only one conversion changes:
request/params type, result/response type, handler, procedure, namespace
unions, native dispatch table, memory-client exposure,
named barrels, and
tevmfacade. - Assert the wire shape exactly and prove
JSON.stringify(response)succeeds. JSON-RPC outputs contain noPromise,bigint, typed array,Error, orundefined. Quantities use minimal hex; byte data is even-length; fixed storage words are 32-byte left-padded; spec-nullable fields arenull. - Cover the report's alternate/negative branch: null and error provider
responses, short and full-width encodings, legacy transaction fields,
missing transport, manual mining, or state transitions as applicable. Assert
the stable error class and JSON-RPC numeric code. Do not share mutable clients,
Commoninstances, caches, or timers between test cases. - Correct JSDoc and guide text only where the repaired public contract was wrong. Examples are executable, fully imported, and type-valid.
- Add a patch changeset naming every published package whose runtime behavior changed. Run all declared gates and keep the diff focused on this method.
Do not update snapshots until the focused semantic assertions pass. Never turn an unexpected error snapshot into the new expected behavior merely to make the suite green.
Execution and state belong to sibling ZEVM, Voltaire, and Guillotine Mini repositories. This action may fix TEVM host adapters. If the regression requires a native patch, identify the owning files and required regression in the result; do not recreate a JavaScript engine or edit outside the candidate write set.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 45 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 644a9d9df662
repair-rpc-regression is a skill published in the GitHub repository evmts/tevm (446 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 600 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
forge-bugfix
A structured bug-fixing process that investigates one problem at a time, records evidence, tests the fix, and waits for the user's final acceptance.
solidity
Solidity smart-contract authoring authority — ERC20/ERC721/ERC1155 token standards, reentrancy guards, access control, gas optimisation, upgradeable proxies, Foundry testing, fuzzing, invariant checks, and production contract security for EVM chains.
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.
experimental-code-coverage-local-debugger
Runs code coverage locally via Universal Test Runner (UTR) or helper scripts, mimicking LUCI trybots. Activate when CQ tryjobs fail or underreport coverage, to test local GN/recipe repairs before uploading, or to debug hermetic crashes.
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
cli-e2e
Write, modify, or debug Docker-based Composio CLI end-to-end tests under ts/e2e-tests/cli, including binary invocation, fixture isolation, output assertions, and package manifests. Use for CLI E2E test suites only; use cli-command for CLI source implementation.