Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add EvoClaw/amplify --skill method-framework-designgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EvoClaw/amplifyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/evoclaw/amplify/method-framework-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/evoclaw/amplify/method-framework-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/evoclaw/amplify/method-framework-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/evoclaw/amplify/method-framework-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/evoclaw/amplify/method-framework-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.07726 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.03090 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01545 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00773 |
Grade A, and why
method-framework-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 747 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Method & Framework Design (Phase 3)
Overview
This is the most critical branching point in the research workflow. Type M and Type D projects follow completely different design paths. Executing the wrong path — or skipping design entirely — guarantees wasted effort.
On-Demand Literature Search (Active Throughout Phase 3)
- "Has anyone tried approach X for this problem?"
- "What's the current SOTA for sub-task Y?"
- "Is there theoretical justification for design choice Z?"
- "What hyperparameters did paper W use for this baseline?"
When this happens: SEARCH IMMEDIATELY. Do not guess, do not rely on memory, do not defer to "we'll check later." Use web search, arXiv, Google Scholar, or any available tools to find the answer NOW.
Update the literature record: Any new papers found during Phase 3 should be added to docs/02_literature/paper-list.md with a note: [Found during Phase 3 — method design].
If search fails (no results, paywall, or tools unavailable): do NOT fabricate an answer. Instead:
- Note the specific question that needs answering: "Need to know: [question]"
- Record it in the exploration report
- Ask the user: "I couldn't find information on [X]. Do you know, or can you check?"
- Continue with what you know, marking the gap as an assumption to verify
This applies equally to Phase 4, 5, and 6. Literature retrieval is a continuous activity, not a one-time Phase 1 task.
Re-Entry from Phase 4a (Exploratory Return Path)
If the user returns to Phase 3 from Phase 4a exploration (because baseline results or data analysis revealed the method/analysis design needs rethinking), do NOT start from scratch:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 747 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A b3fbd3add131
method-framework-design is a skill published in the GitHub repository EvoClaw/amplify (11 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 7,726 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
make_plan
For external plan request scenarios, guides the Agent to request a clear, actionable, step-by-step plan from a stronger Agent via listagents and chatwithagent, emphasizing that the plan is executed by the requester, not by the consulted Agent.
gpt-image-2
A skill for generating or editing images with GPT Image 2 across local, host-provided, or advisory setups.
motion-showreel
A code-based workflow for making short videos built from animated graphics, text, logos, or interface elements. It produces MP4 video and editable source code rather than filming or editing existing footage.
new
Create a new project to start development quickly.
oss-upload
Upload local files to Tencent COS (oss.1024code.com CDN) using coscli. Use when user wants to upload a file to CDN/OSS, or deploy static assets.
officecli-word-form
Use this skill to create fillable Word forms (.docx) with real Content Controls (SDT) + legacy FormField checkboxes + MERGEFIELD mail-merge placeholders + document protection. Trigger on: 'fillable form', 'form fields', 'content controls', 'SDT', 'word form', 'fill in', 'only editable fields', 'protect document'…