Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/evolvehq/docflow/ship-itemnpx skills add EvolveHQ/docflow --skill ship-itemgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EvolveHQ/docflowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00096 | $0.00805 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00402 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
ship-item scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ship-item
Execute the completion event for one queue item. This is the most order-sensitive operation in the system — follow the steps exactly.
Step 0 — Preconditions and context
- Confirm the repo is bootstrapped with a
plan/queue. - Read
CONVENTIONS.mdandAGENTS.mdfor: the integration model (direct-to-main fast-forward vs. PR-based with required CI), the verify gate command, the multi-agent mode, and the Git contract (signed commits, tags, trailers). Resolveadr/,plan/, andINDEX.mdagainst the artefact root recorded inCONVENTIONS.md(default: repository root).
Step 1 — Select the item
Default to the lowest-numbered plan/todo/ file, or the one the user
names. Read it and the owning ADR(s) in full.
Step 2 — Verify
Run the repo's verify gate. Require a pass. Do not bypass with
--no-verify or equivalent. If it fails, stop, surface the failure,
fix the root cause, re-run.
Step 3 — Integrate (per the repo's model)
- Direct-to-main, fast-forward:
git merge --ff-only <branch>(or the work is already onmain), thengit push origin main. The verify gate ran locally in Step 2. - PR-based: push the branch,
gh pr create --draft --fill, wait for CI green (gh pr checks --watch),gh pr ready, thengh pr mergewith the repo's strategy. Confirm the merge landed onmainbefore continuing.
Step 4 — Move the queue item
Once the change is on main:
git mv plan/todo/NNNN-<slug>.md plan/done/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>.md(today's date prefix).- Amend the moved file with a footer: "Shipped at HEAD
<sha>" plus any artefact id, image tag, deploy id, or PR link.
Step 5 — Advance the ADR(s) and regenerate
- Advance each owning ADR's
status:fromAcceptedtoImplemented. - Append a Revision History row if the status change is substantive
(it is). Regenerate
INDEX.mdto match.
Step 6 — Record
If _agent/ was omitted at bootstrap (Q5 = None), skip this step — git
history is the record.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 72 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A f22d1f92cc5a
ship-item is a skill published in the GitHub repository EvolveHQ/docflow (11 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 805 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
adr-integration
This skill should be used when the user asks about "ADR integration", "ADR CI/CD", "ADR tooling", "ADR automation", "export ADRs", "ADR documentation site", or needs guidance on integrating ADRs with CI/CD, documentation sites, and other tools.
adr-format-structured-madr
This skill should be used when the user asks about "structured MADR", "structured-madr", "frontmatter ADR", "comprehensive ADR", "auditable ADR", or needs guidance on creating ADRs using the Structured MADR format with YAML frontmatter and audit sections.
adr-decision-drivers
This skill should be used when the user asks about "decision drivers", "architectural forces", "quality attributes", "how to identify trade-offs", "non-functional requirements for ADRs", or needs help identifying, documenting, and weighing the forces that influence architectural decisions.
adr-format-madr
This skill should be used when the user asks about "MADR format", "MADR template", "Markdown Architectural Decision Records", "MADR 4.0", "MADR sections", or needs guidance on creating ADRs using the MADR (Markdown Architectural Decision Records) format.
adr-fundamentals
This skill should be used when the user asks "what is an ADR", "when should I create an ADR", "ADR best practices", "architecture decision records", "ADR lifecycle", "how to document architecture decisions", or needs guidance on ADR fundamentals, when to create ADRs, or ADR lifecycle management.
adr-quality
This skill should be used when the user asks about "ADR quality", "review ADR", "ADR checklist", "improve ADR", "ADR validation", "good ADR examples", or needs guidance on evaluating, improving, and maintaining high-quality architectural decision records.