advisory-negotiation

advisory-negotiation is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from evoputa/ai-advisory-board. It costs 59 tokens per session (381 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A panel of negotiation advisers represented by written personas, each offering a different approach to resolving disagreements. It selects two to four relevant advisers and lets their views differ.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to think through one-to-one negotiations, international or multi-party deals, cross-cultural conflicts, and questions about alternatives or bargaining positions.
Why use it?
It helps when a negotiation problem needs more than one viewpoint, such as balancing tactical persuasion with fair principles or handling several parties.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to think through one-to-one negotiations, international or multi-party deals, cross-cultural conflicts, and questions about alternatives or bargaining positions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/evoputa/ai-advisory-board/negotiation
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add evoputa/ai-advisory-board --skill negotiation
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/evoputa/ai-advisory-board

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for advisory-negotiation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/evoputa/ai-advisory-board/negotiation/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/evoputa/ai-advisory-board/negotiation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/evoputa/ai-advisory-board/negotiation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/evoputa/ai-advisory-board/negotiation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for advisory-negotiation

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/evoputa/ai-advisory-board/negotiation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/evoputa/ai-advisory-board/negotiation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 59 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 381 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00059 $0.00381
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.00191
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00076
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00038

Measured 9d ago against content hash 06d897ad2f7a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

advisory-negotiation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

domains/negotiation/SKILL.md · 36 lines

What it actually says

Negotiation Advisory Panel

Advisors

Name Region Lens
Chris Voss North America Tactical empathy, calibrated questions, never split the difference
Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala Africa Multi-lateral negotiation, trade frameworks, institutional deals
Carlos Ghosn Asia Cross-cultural turnarounds, alliance negotiation, accountability
William Ury North America Principled negotiation, BATNA, getting to yes
Ngaire Woods Europe Global governance, institutional design, power asymmetry

Panel Dynamics

  • Tactical vs. principled: Voss uses psychological tactics. Ury insists on principled positions. Both produce results in different contexts.
  • Bilateral vs. multilateral: Voss and Ghosn negotiate 1-on-1. Okonjo-Iweala and Woods manage multi-party negotiations. Different muscles entirely.

How It Works

  1. Read the user's question and identify the core tension
  2. Load persona details from references/personas.md
  3. Select 2-4 advisors most relevant to the specific question
  4. Each advisor speaks in first person - 2-4 sentences in their authentic voice
  5. Allow disagreement - different philosophies should surface
  6. Deliver a Panel Synthesis with a specific recommendation and next action

Reference Files

  • references/personas.md - Full profiles for all advisors on this panel
Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 36 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 06d897ad2f7a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

advisory-negotiation is a skill published in the GitHub repository evoputa/ai-advisory-board (10 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 381 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

triumvirate-strategy

Multi-perspective business strategy debate using three AI advisors (Creative Strategist, Market Skeptic, Financial Realist). Use this skill when the user asks for business strategy analysis, wants to evaluate a business plan, needs to stress-test a business idea, asks for multi-angle feedback on a proposal, mentions…

LionHuang/triumvirate-strategy · 142 tokens

skill-builder

Automatically detect source types and build AI skills using Skill Seekers. Use when the user wants to create skills from documentation, repos, PDFs, videos, or other knowledge sources.

yusufkaraaslan/Skill_Seekers · 38 tokens

thinking-systems

When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills · 39 tokens

thinking-five-whys-plus

When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills · 41 tokens

thinking-map-territory

When a claim, doc, test, metric, or assumption conflicts with observed behavior, stop theorizing from the map and verify the live code or data; let territory overrule.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills · 42 tokens

thinking-theory-of-constraints

When throughput or latency is pipeline-limited, identify the single binding constraint and exploit, subordinate, elevate, then recheck—ignore non-constraints.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills · 37 tokens