Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/exchanet/method_enterprise_builder_planning/lint-microtasknpx skills add exchanet/method_enterprise_builder_planning --skill lint-microtaskgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/exchanet/method_enterprise_builder_planningWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/exchanet/method_enterprise_builder_planning/lint-microtask)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/exchanet/method_enterprise_builder_planning/lint-microtask"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/exchanet/method_enterprise_builder_planning/lint-microtask.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00617 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00309 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
lint-microtask scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Skill: Lint Microtask
Purpose
Validate that a source code file complies with the ≤50 effective lines micro-task constraint. "Effective lines" excludes blank lines, comment-only lines, and import/using lines.
When to use
- After implementing any micro-task in Phase 4
- During the Check step of the PDCA-T cycle (Plan → Do → Check → Act → Test)
- Before marking a micro-task as complete
- When a file appears to exceed the 50-line budget
How to run
# Single file
node packs/enterprise-microtask-planner-pack/validators/microtask-linter/src/index.ts \
--task=src/payments/domain/money.ts
# All files in a directory
node packs/enterprise-microtask-planner-pack/validators/microtask-linter/src/index.ts \
--dir=src/payments/ --recursive
# Custom line limit
node packs/enterprise-microtask-planner-pack/validators/microtask-linter/src/index.ts \
--task=src/file.ts --max-lines=40
Supported languages
- TypeScript (
.ts,.tsx) - JavaScript (
.js,.mjs,.cjs) - Python (
.py)
Output interpretation
PASS:
✓ src/payments/domain/money.ts — PASS (38 effective lines)
FAIL with split suggestions:
✗ src/payments/application/authorize-payment.ts — FAIL (67 effective lines > 50)
Breakdown: 89 total | 67 code | 12 comments | 8 imports | 2 blank
Suggested split (3 units):
├── extract: unit-1() [lines 1–28] ~22 effective lines
├── extract: unit-2() [lines 29–55] ~24 effective lines
└── extract: unit-3() [lines 56–89] ~21 effective lines
Result: 3 micro-tasks of ~22 lines each
Action on FAIL
- Review the split suggestions
- Extract each suggested unit into its own file
- Re-run the linter on each new file to confirm all pass
- Update the micro-task backlog to reflect the split
- Continue with the Act step of PDCA-T
Gate rule
A micro-task that exceeds 50 effective lines cannot be marked as complete until it is split.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 77 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 000dbec4e987
lint-microtask is a skill published in the GitHub repository exchanet/method_enterprise_builder_planning (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 617 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
033-architecture-diagrams
Use when you need to generate Java project diagrams — including UML sequence diagrams, UML class diagrams, C4 model diagrams, UML state machine diagrams, UML Deployment Diagrams, ER (Entity Relationship) diagrams, and bounded-context diagrams — through a modular, step-based interactive process that adapts to your…
042-planning-openspec
Use when creating or updating OpenSpec artifacts from an issue, plan, approved design, ADRs, existing OpenSpec, or a valid combination. The workflow assesses reviewable scope, records source authority and derivation, handles conflicts, and prevents silent synchronization. Triggers include Create OpenSpec from an…
059-design-atdd
Use when reviewing whether an OpenSpec change's execution goal, acceptance criteria, and implementation or verification tasks are aligned. This should trigger for requests such as Review this OpenSpec change with ATDD; Check acceptance criteria against tasks; Find acceptance criteria without task coverage; Detect…
022-root-cause-analysis
Use when a framed problem needs root-cause investigation rather than a symptom-level fix, applying Five Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa), Current Reality Tree, and constraint identification. This should trigger when an issue's Root Cause Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to find the…
025-quality-attribute-discovery
Use when a problem under exploration needs its quality attributes (non-functional requirements) identified and prioritized before architecture and design begin. This should trigger when an issue's Quality Attribute Discovery point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to discover and prioritize…
031-architecture-adr-functional-requirements
Facilitates conversational discovery to create Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for functional requirements covering CLI, REST/HTTP APIs, or both. Use when the user wants to document command-line or HTTP service architecture, capture functional requirements, create ADRs for CLI or API projects, or design…