Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/existential-birds/beagle/explanation-docsnpx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill explanation-docsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/existential-birds/beagleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/explanation-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/explanation-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/existential-birds/beagle/explanation-docs.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00064 | $0.03884 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01942 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00777 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00388 |
Grade A, and why
explanation-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 474 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Explanation Documentation Skill
This skill provides patterns for writing effective explanation documents. Explanations are understanding-oriented content for readers who want to know why things work the way they do.
Dependency: Use this skill with docs-style for core writing principles. To confirm explanation is the right type — rather than a tutorial, how-to, or reference — see docs-style/references/diataxis-compass.md.
Purpose & Audience
Target readers:
- Users who want to understand concepts deeply, not just use them
- Architects and technical leads evaluating design decisions
- Team members onboarding to a codebase or system
- Anyone asking "why?" or "how does this work?"
Explanations are for reading away from the keyboard. Unlike tutorials or how-to guides, readers aren't trying to accomplish a task while reading. They're building mental models.
Explanations are NOT:
- Tutorials (which teach through hands-on doing)
- How-To guides (which accomplish specific goals)
- Reference docs (which look up precise details)
Explanation Document Template
Use this structure for all explanation documents:
---
title: "[Concept/System Name] Explained"
description: "Understand how [concept] works and why it was designed this way"
---
# Understanding [Concept]
Brief intro (2-3 sentences): What this document explains and why it matters. Set expectations for what the reader will understand after reading.
## Overview
High-level summary of the concept. What is it? What problem does it solve? This should be understandable without deep technical knowledge.
## Background and Context
### The Problem
What situation or challenge led to this design? What were users or developers struggling with?
### Historical Context
How did we get here? What came before? This helps readers understand why alternatives were rejected or why certain constraints exist.
## How It Works
### Core Concepts
Explain the fundamental ideas. Use analogies to connect to concepts readers already understand.
<Note>
Use diagrams or visual aids when explaining complex relationships or flows.
</Note>
### The Mechanism
Walk through how the system actually operates. This is conceptual, not procedural - explain the "what happens" rather than "what to do."
### Key Components
Break down the major parts and how they interact. For each component:
- What role does it play?
- How does it relate to other components?
## Design Decisions and Trade-offs
### Why This Approach?
Explain the reasoning behind key design choices. What goals drove these decisions?
### Trade-offs Made
Every design involves trade-offs. Be explicit about:
- What was prioritized
- What was sacrificed
- Under what conditions this design excels or struggles
### Constraints and Assumptions
What constraints shaped the design? What assumptions does it rely on?
## Alternatives Considered
### [Alternative Approach 1]
Brief description of an alternative approach. Why wasn't it chosen? Under what circumstances might it be better?
### [Alternative Approach 2]
Another alternative. Comparing alternatives helps readers understand the design space.
## Implications and Consequences
What does this design mean for:
- Performance?
- Scalability?
- Developer experience?
- Future extensibility?
## Related Concepts
- [Related Concept 1](/concepts/related-1) - How it connects to this topic
- [Related Concept 2](/concepts/related-2) - Another related area
- [Deeper Technical Reference](/reference/detail) - For implementation specifics
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 474 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 8fb21145b644
explanation-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository existential-birds/beagle (79 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 3,884 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
exploratory-data-analysis
Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…
media-ingest
Ingest video, audio, PDF, book, screenshot, and GitHub repo content into the brain. Multi-format handling with entity extraction and backlink propagation. Covers video-ingest, youtube-ingest, and book-ingest subtypes.
feishu
Work with Feishu or Lark bots, docs, sheets, bitables, approval flows, and OpenAPI/MCP setup without hardcoding credentials.
read
Reads URLs and PDFs by fetching source content, defaulting to concise summaries for plain read requests and clean Markdown when asked to convert, save, quote, cite, or feed downstream work. Use when users ask in any language to read, fetch, check, summarize, quote, cite, convert, or save a URL or PDF. Not for local…
docx-comment-reply
Reply to comments (批注) in Word .docx/.doc files: extract comment context, draft replies, write threaded replies back, and validate OOXML.