Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill healthkit-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/existential-birds/beagleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/healthkit-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/healthkit-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/existential-birds/beagle/healthkit-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/healthkit-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/existential-birds/beagle/healthkit-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00898 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00359 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00180 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
healthkit-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
HealthKit Code Review
Quick Reference
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| HKHealthStore, permissions, status checks, privacy | references/authorization.md |
| HKQuery types, predicates, anchored queries, statistics | references/queries.md |
| Background delivery, observer queries, completion handlers | references/background.md |
| HKQuantityType, HKCategoryType, workouts, units | references/data-types.md |
Review Checklist
-
HKHealthStore.isHealthDataAvailable()called before any HealthKit operations - Authorization requested only for needed data types (minimal permissions)
-
requestAuthorizationcompletion handler not misinterpreted as permission granted - No attempt to determine read permission status (privacy by design)
- Query results dispatched to main thread for UI updates
-
HKObjectQueryNoLimitused only with bounded predicates -
HKStatisticsQueryused for aggregations instead of manual summing - Observer query
completionHandler()always called (usedefer) - Background delivery registered in
application(_:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:) - Background delivery entitlement added (iOS 15+)
- Correct units used for quantity types (e.g.,
count/minfor heart rate) - Long-running queries stored as properties and stopped in
deinit
When to Load References
- Reviewing authorization/permissions flow -> authorization.md
- Reviewing HKSampleQuery, HKAnchoredObjectQuery, or predicates -> queries.md
- Reviewing HKObserverQuery or
enableBackgroundDelivery-> background.md - Reviewing HKQuantityType, HKCategoryType, or HKWorkout -> data-types.md
Review gates
Run in order. Do not state a finding in a later step until the pass condition for the current step is satisfied (each pass condition is answerable from the codebase under review).
- Scope — Pass: Name the file path(s) and types/symbols using
HealthKit,HKHealthStore, orHK*APIs (or state clearly that the diff touches none). - Availability and store — Pass: Cite the call site of
isHealthDataAvailable()before HealthKit use, or document why omission is acceptable for the scoped code; cite whereHKHealthStoreis created or injected. - Authorization semantics — Pass: For each
requestAuthorization/getRequestStatusForAuthorization, cite handler branches per references/authorization.md (e.g. success does not prove read access); do not infer read permission fromauthorizationStatusalone. - Queries and limits — Pass: For each query, cite predicate + limit (
HKObjectQueryNoLimitonly with a bounded predicate); for totals/aggregates, citeHKStatisticsQuery/ collection vs manual summing per references/queries.md. - Observers and background — Pass: If
HKObserverQueryorenableBackgroundDeliveryappears, cite where the observer is started/stopped and where background delivery is registered; cite entitlements/Info.plist or flag missing config per references/background.md. If absent, Pass: one line “no observer/background in scope.” - Threading and lifecycle — Pass: Cite main-queue (or documented pattern) for UI updates from query callbacks; cite retention/
stop()/deinitfor long-running queries per checklist above.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A a74099477342
healthkit-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository existential-birds/beagle (82 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 898 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
app-store-review
Evaluates code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. Use this skill when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS app code (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, or Expo) to identify potential App Store rejection issues before submission. Triggers on tasks involving app review preparation, compliance…
swift-concurrency-pro
Reviews Swift code for concurrency correctness, modern API usage, and common async/await pitfalls. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing Swift concurrency code.
swiftui-pro
Comprehensively reviews SwiftUI code for best practices on modern APIs, maintainability, and performance. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing SwiftUI projects.
axiom-audit-camera
Use this agent to scan Swift code for camera, video, and audio capture issues including deprecated APIs, missing interruption handlers, threading violations, and permission anti-patterns.
mobile-platform-offline-validate
Review a Lightning Web Component for mobile offline compatibility — the Komaci offline static analyzer that pre-primes the data graph for Salesforce Mobile App Plus and Field Service Mobile App. Produces a finding list with code-level fixes covering inline GraphQL queries in @wire configurations, modern lwc:if /…
mobiai-review-code
Use when reviewing mobile code changes — check for lifecycle issues, memory leaks, thread safety, and platform-specific pitfalls.