Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill langgraph-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/existential-birds/beagleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/langgraph-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/langgraph-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/existential-birds/beagle/langgraph-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/langgraph-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/existential-birds/beagle/langgraph-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.02342 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00937 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00468 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00234 |
Grade A, and why
langgraph-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- langgraph-implementation — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 347 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LangGraph Implementation
Core Concepts
LangGraph builds stateful, multi-actor agent applications using a graph-based architecture:
- StateGraph: Builder class for defining graphs with shared state
- Nodes: Functions that read state and return partial updates
- Edges: Define execution flow (static or conditional)
- Channels: Internal state management (LastValue, BinaryOperatorAggregate)
- Checkpointer: Persistence for pause/resume capabilities
Implementation gates
Use these sequenced checks for persistence and human-in-the-loop flows (avoid “it should work” without evidence):
-
Checkpointed runs
- Build
configwith{"configurable": {"thread_id": "<stable-id>"}}beforeinvoke/ainvoke. - Pass: The same
thread_idis reused for every turn of one conversation; a new conversation uses a new id.
- Build
-
State after a step
- Pass:
graph.get_state(config).values(or equivalent) contains the keys and reducer outputs your next node or client expects; if not, fix routing, reducers, or node order before continuing.
- Pass:
-
Interrupt and resume (HITL)
- Pass: After a pause, you have inspected pending work (
get_state, and your LangGraph version’s interrupt listing if you rely on it) so you know which node is waiting and what resume payload shape to send. - Pass:
Command(resume=...)(or equivalent) includes every field the code path afterinterrupt()reads.
- Pass: After a pause, you have inspected pending work (
-
Checkpointer vs environment
- Pass: Tests or local dev use
InMemorySaveror disposable SQLite; production uses a durable checkpointer configured for that deployment (not in-memory).
- Pass: Tests or local dev use
Essential Imports
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, START, END
from langgraph.graph.message import MessagesState, add_messages
from langgraph.checkpoint.memory import InMemorySaver
from langgraph.types import Command, Send, interrupt, RetryPolicy
from typing import Annotated
from typing_extensions import TypedDict
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 347 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A ac9b092677ca
langgraph-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository existential-birds/beagle (84 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 2,342 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
advisor-orchestrator-worker
Use when a task is too large for one model pass, needs parallel research or generation across many subtasks (like researching a dozen competitors at once), or the user asks to orchestrate multiple models, split work across a model team, run an advisor-worker loop, have a stronger model review the plan while cheap…
council-review
Multi-model validation council — auto-validate plans, architecture changes, and PRs via validate-plan/review before executing.
rag-techniques-contribution-guidelines
Checks a RAGTechniques pull request against the repository's contribution guidelines (CONTRIBUTING.md): where new technique notebooks go, the README list entry and table row every new technique needs, the required notebook structure, and notebook hygiene. Use on any PR that adds or changes a notebook under…
code-review-pi
Review code for quality, run linters, check test coverage, fix issues, and enforce gates. Save the final report to ./specs/issues/003-code-review-pi/PROMPT.md. Use before committing changes.
code-review
Structured code review prompt with language and focus area.
bmad-checkpoint-preview
LLM-assisted human-in-the-loop review. Make sense of a change, focus attention where it matters, test. Use when the user says "checkpoint", "human review", or "walk me through this change".