rust-testing-code-review

rust-testing-code-review is a skill for Claude Code from existential-birds/beagle. It costs 44 tokens per session (3,465 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review guide for Rust test code, covering unit tests, integration tests, asynchronous tests, mocks, and property-based tests. It also checks changes in the Rust 2024 edition.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing Rust tests, including their organization, assertions, fixtures, error cases, and async runtime setup.
Why use it?
It helps find weak test coverage, shared state between tests, incorrect asynchronous setup, and outdated patterns before they cause misleading results or maintenance problems.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the beagle-rust plugin — 11 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it when reviewing Rust tests, including their organization, assertions, fixtures, error cases, and async runtime setup.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/existential-birds/beagle/rust-testing-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill rust-testing-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install beagle-rust, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 11 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for rust-testing-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/existential-birds/beagle/rust-testing-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/rust-testing-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/rust-testing-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/existential-birds/beagle/rust-testing-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for rust-testing-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/rust-testing-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/existential-birds/beagle/rust-testing-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,465 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.03465
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.01386
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00693
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00347

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 1256261a3efa, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

rust-testing-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/beagle-rust/skills/rust-testing-code-review/SKILL.md · 203 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Rust Testing Code Review

Review Workflow

  1. Check Rust edition — Note edition in Cargo.toml (2021 vs 2024). Edition 2024 changes temporary scoping in if let and tail expressions, and makes #[expect] the preferred lint suppression
  2. Check test organization — Unit tests in #[cfg(test)] modules, integration tests in tests/ directory
  3. Check async test setup — #[tokio::test] for async tests, proper runtime configuration. Check for async-trait on mocks that could use native async fn in traits
  4. Check assertions — Meaningful messages, correct assertion type. Review if let assertions for edition 2024 temporary scope changes
  5. Check test isolation — No shared mutable state between tests, proper setup/teardown. Prefer LazyLock over lazy_static!/once_cell for shared fixtures
  6. Check coverage patterns — Error paths tested, edge cases covered

Gates (hard)

Do not advance to Output Format until each pass condition is satisfied (yes/no with a concrete artifact).

  1. Edition recorded — Open the target crate’s Cargo.toml (or workspace [workspace.package] / inherited edition) and note the edition value. Pass: you can quote edition = "…" (or document “inherited from workspace”) before citing Rust 2024–specific behavior (if let / tail temporary drops, #[expect] vs #[allow] migration, native async fn in traits as default). If edition is not 2024, do not report those items as edition-2024 regressions; at most Informational if still useful.
  2. dyn vs static async mocks — Before suggesting native async fn in traits instead of async-trait, check whether the mock is used as dyn Trait. Pass: if dyn is required, you either skip that suggestion or align with Valid Patterns (async-trait still needed).
  3. Verification protocol — Pass: steps from the review-verification-protocol skill are done before any finding is listed (see Before Submitting Findings).

Read the full file on GitHub · 203 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 203 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 1256261a3efa

Subscribe to this mod's changes

rust-testing-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository existential-birds/beagle (82 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 3,465 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories