Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill swiftdata-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/existential-birds/beagleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/swiftdata-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/swiftdata-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/existential-birds/beagle/swiftdata-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/swiftdata-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/existential-birds/beagle/swiftdata-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00671 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00268 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00134 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
swiftdata-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 55 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SwiftData Code Review
Quick Reference
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| @Model, @Attribute, @Relationship, delete rules | references/model-design.md |
| @Query, #Predicate, FetchDescriptor, #Index | references/queries.md |
| @ModelActor, ModelContext, background operations | references/concurrency.md |
| VersionedSchema, MigrationStage, lightweight/custom | references/migrations.md |
Hard gates (before reporting findings)
Run in order; do not assert an issue until the gate for that issue passes.
- Scope — pass when: You have the target
.swiftpath(s) and confirmed SwiftData surface in scope (e.g.import SwiftData,@Model,@Query,@ModelActor,VersionedSchema, or migration types). If none apply, stop or narrow scope with one sentence. - Reference — pass when: For each checklist area you evaluate (models, queries, concurrency, migrations), you opened the matching
references/*.mdfrom the Quick Reference table or wroteN/A: no <area> in this reviewwith a one-line reason. - Evidence — pass when: Every finding uses the
[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLEheader (line range allowed) from the file you read; no finding without a cite. - Report — pass when: Findings list cites first (or inline) using
[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE, then severity or checklist grouping—no uncited assertions.
Review Checklist
- Models marked
final(subclassing crashes) - @Relationship decorator on ONE side only (not both)
- Delete rules explicitly set (not relying on default .nullify)
- Relationships initialized to empty arrays, not default objects
- Batch operations used for bulk inserts (
append(contentsOf:)) - @Query not loading thousands of items on main thread
- External values in predicates captured in local variables
- Scalar comparisons in predicates (not object references)
- @ModelActor used for background operations
- PersistentIdentifier/DTOs used to pass data between actors
- VersionedSchema defined for each shipped version
- MigrationPlan passed to ModelContainer
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 55 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 1be72ae3f577
swiftdata-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository existential-birds/beagle (82 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 671 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
triage-contributor-pr
Triage open pull requests from external contributors to prisma/orm and produce a per-PR verdict with evidence. Use when a maintainer asks to triage, evaluate, assess, or review the queue of incoming contributor PRs, to decide whether a fork PR is safe to run CI on, to check whether a PR is in scope for its version…
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
no-bare-casts
Writing as in TypeScript or TSX production code, modifying a file that contains a bare as cast, silencing a type error with a cast, encountering as unknown as, or reviewing a cast site.
review-prs
Review a GitHub pull request in the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo against the team's reviewer checklist: PR title/description conventions, linked issue, logic errors and unhandled edge cases, breaking changes, test coverage, docs updates, security (input handling), and new dependencies. Use whenever a maintainer asks…
migration-review
Review database migration files when a change adds or modifies paths under migrations/. Use it before merge to collect forward, rollback, locking, and data-safety evidence.
ring:using-lib-systemplane
Using lib-systemplane, the hot-reload runtime-config plane (Postgres LISTEN/NOTIFY or MongoDB change streams), in two modes. Sweep Mode detects DIY config reload (SIGHUP, fsnotify, viper, pgx LISTEN), manual tenant-scoping, hand-built admin CRUD, and v4 residue. Reference Mode catalogs client lifecycle and…