Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/extracurricular-ai/codex-rewind/skill-creatornpx skills add extracurricular-ai/codex-rewind --skill skill-creatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/extracurricular-ai/codex-rewindWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/extracurricular-ai/codex-rewind/skill-creator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/extracurricular-ai/codex-rewind/skill-creator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/extracurricular-ai/codex-rewind/skill-creator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.02860 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01430 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00572 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00286 |
Grade A, and why
skill-creator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
70% identical to skill-creator — 393 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 230 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill Creator
Create skills that give Codex useful, non-obvious guidance without constraining unrelated work.
Core Principles
Assume Codex is already capable. Include only information that changes its decisions or improves its work. Remove generic advice, repeated instructions, speculative edge cases, and examples that do not materially clarify the task.
Preserve user intent and scope. A skill should support the requested task, not replace the user's chosen product, expand the assignment, modify unrelated configuration, or imply permission for additional external actions. Do not turn a particular example, past failure, or personal preference into a universal requirement.
Approval to complete a task does not expand its scope or execution permissions. For retrying or externally mutating workflows, define a stopping condition proportional to the risk.
Match specificity to the risk. Give the model room to choose an appropriate approach when multiple approaches are reasonable. Use detailed steps, deterministic scripts, or absolute language only when correctness, safety, permissions, or a genuinely fragile workflow requires them.
For open-ended work, describe the outcome and relevant decision criteria. For workflows with a preferred shape, offer useful examples or configurable scripts. Reserve fixed sequences and narrow parameters for operations where deviation would cause a concrete problem. Preserve non-obvious operational invariants, distinguish actual requirements from optional recommendations or local conventions, and avoid restating policies already enforced elsewhere.
Keep discovery cheap and precise. Skill names and descriptions are available before a skill is loaded. Describe the actual capability and when it applies, adding exclusions only when they prevent likely misrouting. Avoid exhaustive capability lists and catchalls that attract unrelated requests.
Keep skills self-contained; refer to another skill or tool only when the requested workflow genuinely requires it and it is available in the target environment. Specialized review, hardening, or audit workflows should apply when requested or genuinely needed, not merely because ordinary work touches the same subject.
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · -187 lines · -25 tokens per session 6656e5475563
- 6d ago First seen · 417 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A da44c88f6b38
skill-creator is a skill published in the GitHub repository extracurricular-ai/codex-rewind (45 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 2,860 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 70% identical to skill-creator, differing in 393 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
fast-resume
Search local coding-agent session history and identify safe resume commands. Use when the user asks to find, inspect, continue, or recover previous work from Claude Code, Codex, Pi, or another agent indexed by fast-resume.
intuitive-preflight
Turn a vague task, plan, issue, or "LGTM/go ahead" request into an approval-ready preflight contract before implementation starts. Use when the user wants prompt preflight, clearer scope, non-goals, context package, acceptance criteria, definition of done, verification, stop gates, the exact execution command, or…
intuitive-squash
Squash local GSD or agent-generated commit history into a clean, reviewable story while preserving important fixes. Use when the user asks to squash commits, clean git history, compress phase commits, prepare a branch before PR, compare aggressive vs moderate squash options, or preserve hotfix/security commits during…
intuitive-refactor
Refactor and cleanup router for known code/module/API seams, stale surfaces, compatibility shims, architecture cleanup targets, changed-code quality review, oversized modules, repeated cleanup campaigns, and recurring whole-repo architecture maintenance goals. Use this when the user names a concrete seam, wants…
intuitive-shape
Shape a raw product or project idea into a bounded decision before planning or implementation. Use when deciding whether an idea deserves a bet, setting an appetite, comparing candidate bets under finite capacity, cutting scope, exposing rabbit holes and no-gos, or choosing BET, RESEARCH, RESHAPE, or PASS. This skill…
skill-runner
Run a bounded development task through named skills in an isolated, tmux-backed Codex or Claude session. Use for durable or artifact-sensitive worker phases, supervised skill runs, and post-run skill evaluation.