Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add F-U-S-E-E/FuseDevelopmentGroup --skill exp-test-smell-detectiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/F-U-S-E-E/FuseDevelopmentGroupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/f-u-s-e-e/fusedevelopmentgroup/exp-test-smell-detection)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/f-u-s-e-e/fusedevelopmentgroup/exp-test-smell-detection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/f-u-s-e-e/fusedevelopmentgroup/exp-test-smell-detection.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.02493 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.01247 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00499 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00249 |
Grade A, and why
exp-test-smell-detection scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 199 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A 0f54f6465fa3
exp-test-smell-detection is a skill published in the GitHub repository F-U-S-E-E/FuseDevelopmentGroup (22 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 2,493 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
nw-fp-clojure
Clojure language-specific patterns, data-first modeling, REPL-driven development, and spec.
restore-internals-seams-in-finally-blocks-after-each-test
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
mobiai-ios-testing
Use when writing or running tests in an iOS project — unit tests, UI tests, snapshot tests, choosing the right framework.
testing-llm
LLM and AI testing patterns — mock responses, evaluation with DeepEval/RAGAS, structured output validation, and agentic test patterns (generator, healer, planner). Use when testing AI features, validating LLM outputs, or building evaluation pipelines.