Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/f-u-s-e-e/fusedevelopmentgroup/exp-test-taggingnpx skills add F-U-S-E-E/FuseDevelopmentGroup --skill exp-test-tagginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/F-U-S-E-E/FuseDevelopmentGroupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/f-u-s-e-e/fusedevelopmentgroup/exp-test-tagging)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/f-u-s-e-e/fusedevelopmentgroup/exp-test-tagging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/f-u-s-e-e/fusedevelopmentgroup/exp-test-tagging.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.02274 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01137 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00455 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00227 |
Grade A, and why
exp-test-tagging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 176 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A d3cbdbd06b40
exp-test-tagging is a skill published in the GitHub repository F-U-S-E-E/FuseDevelopmentGroup (22 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 2,274 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
nw-fp-clojure
Clojure language-specific patterns, data-first modeling, REPL-driven development, and spec.
restore-internals-seams-in-finally-blocks-after-each-test
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
mobiai-ios-testing
Use when writing or running tests in an iOS project — unit tests, UI tests, snapshot tests, choosing the right framework.
testing-llm
LLM and AI testing patterns — mock responses, evaluation with DeepEval/RAGAS, structured output validation, and agentic test patterns (generator, healer, planner). Use when testing AI features, validating LLM outputs, or building evaluation pipelines.