Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fabiandistler/agents --skill diagnosing-bugsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fabiandistler/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabiandistler/agents/diagnosing-bugs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabiandistler/agents/diagnosing-bugs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabiandistler/agents/diagnosing-bugs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabiandistler/agents/diagnosing-bugs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabiandistler/agents/diagnosing-bugs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02034 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00814 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00407 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
diagnosing-bugs scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
Phase 1 is done when the loop is **tight** and **red-capable**: you can name **one command** (a script path, a test invocation, a curl) that you have **already run at least once** (show the invocation and its output, red The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed 849198df88cd
- 28d ago First seen · 139 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 9168404abda0
diagnosing-bugs is a skill published in the GitHub repository fabiandistler/agents (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,034 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other skills, from other repositories
scale-to-millions
Use this skill whenever the user is designing, reviewing, debugging, or answering interview questions about system/software architecture and scalability — e.g. "scale my app", "how do I handle more traffic", "design a URL shortener / news feed / chat system", "my API is slow under load", "should I shard my database"…
speckit.checker
Static Analysis Aggregator - Run applicable static, configuration, container, security, and stack checks with evidence.
speckit.debug
Systematic Debugger - Reproduce, isolate, prove root causes, and produce a scoped fix plan.
agent-design-review
Review an LLM agent design and find where it will be unreliable, expensive, or unsafe. Use when asked to review an agent architecture, critique a multi-step/tool-using agent, debug an agent that loops or goes off-task, or harden an agent before launch. Produces a structured review — task fit, control flow, tools…
prompt-debugging
Figure out why a prompt isn't working and fix it — diagnose the actual failure (ambiguity, missing context, wrong format, conflicting instructions) instead of randomly rewording. Use when asked why isn't my prompt working, the AI keeps ignoring my instructions, my prompt gives inconsistent results, or how do I fix…
prompt-optimizer
Diagnose and rewrite an underperforming LLM prompt so it produces reliable, well-structured output. Use when asked to improve a prompt, fix a prompt that gives inconsistent or wrong results, reduce hallucination/refusals, or make output follow a format. Produces a rewritten prompt with a diagnosis of what was failing…