Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fabiandistler/agents --skill poc-spec-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fabiandistler/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabiandistler/agents/poc-spec-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabiandistler/agents/poc-spec-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabiandistler/agents/poc-spec-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabiandistler/agents/poc-spec-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabiandistler/agents/poc-spec-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.02929 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.01172 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00586 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00293 |
Grade A, and why
poc-spec-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed 86b548439079
- 4d ago Changed · +3 lines c657fb3b2251
- 6d ago Changed · -2 lines 46380792d5f0
- 8d ago Changed · +4 lines · +4 tokens per session 5d9ea2b25510
- 11d ago Changed 4e9f9f91bb42
- 17d ago Changed · +3 lines 9a202cf5b134
- 1mo ago Changed 63f3a568fbb6
- 1mo ago First seen · 118 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A a0c92f797ea9
poc-spec-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository fabiandistler/agents (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,929 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.
Other skills, from other repositories
scale-to-millions
Use this skill whenever the user is designing, reviewing, debugging, or answering interview questions about system/software architecture and scalability — e.g. "scale my app", "how do I handle more traffic", "design a URL shortener / news feed / chat system", "my API is slow under load", "should I shard my database"…
user-story-writer
Escribir historias de usuario bien estructuradas con criterios de aceptación y casos extremos. Úsalo cuando te pidan escribir historias de usuario, crear tickets a partir de un resumen de características, convertir un PRD en historias o redactar criterios de aceptación. Produce historias listas para estimar en formato…
test-driven-development
Use when practicing TDD. Covers the red-green-refactor loop, choosing the next test, designing through tests, and when TDD is and is not the right approach. Trigger on "let's do tdd", "write the failing test first", "red green refactor", "what test should i write next". Do not use for deciding test levels across a…
test-writer
Write thorough tests following TDD and BDD principles.
testing-patterns
Plan, write, and maintain automated tests in any language, with worked examples in Python and JavaScript/TypeScript. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write or plan tests, apply TDD (red-green-refactor), structure unit tests with arrange-act-assert and given-when-then naming, choose between fakes, stubs, and…
tdd
You MUST use this when implementing testable behavior changes - new features, bug fixes, or refactors with observable contracts. Covers writing meaningful failing tests before implementation and verifying behavior through the red-green-refactor cycle. Not for purely mechanical edits without behavior changes.