Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall --skill business-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_MallWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/business-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/business-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/business-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/business-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/business-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.01864 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00932 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00373 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00186 |
Grade A, and why
business-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 274 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Business Analysis Skill
Patterns for requirements elicitation, BRDs, process analysis, and stakeholder alignment.
Business Analysis Deliverables
| Deliverable | Purpose | Audience |
|---|---|---|
| Business Case | Justify investment | Executives, sponsors |
| BRD | Document requirements | All stakeholders |
| Functional Spec | Detail system behavior | Dev team, testers |
| Use Cases | Describe user interactions | Designers, developers |
| Process Maps | Visualize workflows | Process owners, analysts |
| Data Dictionary | Define data elements | Technical team |
Requirements Hierarchy
Business Requirements (WHY)
└── Stakeholder Requirements (WHO needs WHAT)
└── Solution Requirements
├── Functional (WHAT it does)
└── Non-Functional (HOW WELL it does it)
└── Transition Requirements (HOW we get there)
BRD Structure
Standard Sections
- Executive Summary — One-page overview for executives
- Business Objectives — Measurable goals (SMART)
- Scope — In scope, out of scope, boundaries
- Stakeholders — Who's involved, their interests
- Current State — As-is process, pain points
- Future State — To-be vision, benefits
- Functional Requirements — What the solution must do
- Non-Functional Requirements — Quality attributes
- Assumptions & Constraints — Known limitations
- Dependencies — External factors
- Risks — What could go wrong
- Glossary — Term definitions
Requirements Writing
SMART Criteria
| Letter | Meaning | Test |
|---|---|---|
| S | Specific | Is it clear what's needed? |
| M | Measurable | Can we verify it's done? |
| A | Achievable | Is it realistic? |
| R | Relevant | Does it support objectives? |
| T | Time-bound | Is there a deadline? |
Good vs. Bad Requirements
| Bad | Problem | Better |
|---|---|---|
| "System should be fast" | Not measurable | "Page load < 2 seconds" |
| "Easy to use" | Subjective | "Complete task in < 3 clicks" |
| "Handle all cases" | Unbounded | "Support cases A, B, C" |
| "Similar to competitor" | Vague | "[Specific features listed]" |
| "Should probably..." | Uncertain | "Must" or "Should" (MoSCoW) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 274 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 71c742cdd57f
business-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,864 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
apply-cross-functional-leadership
Use when a manager needs to lead a project or initiative that depends on team members or stakeholders they do not formally manage — to build voluntary cooperation, alignment, and momentum across organizational boundaries through influence rather than authority.
apply-high-performer-retention
Use when a manager wants to proactively retain top-performing direct reports — because high performers have the most options to leave and require active, differentiated management attention to stay engaged and challenged.
apply-intrinsic-motivation
Use when a manager wants to design work, roles, or conditions that sustain employee motivation over the long term — by understanding what drives internal engagement rather than relying primarily on compensation, perks, or external incentives.
build-inclusion-practices
Use when a manager wants to create a team environment where people from different backgrounds have equitable access to voice, visibility, advancement opportunities, and meaningful work — beyond just having diverse representation on the team.
build-psychological-safety
Use when a team leader wants to assess and improve the degree to which team members feel safe to speak up, admit mistakes, ask questions, and disagree — because psychological safety is the strongest predictor of team learning and high performance.
design-team-culture
Use when a manager wants to intentionally shape the values, behaviors, and working patterns that define how their team operates — going beyond written norms to embed culture through rituals, stories, symbols, and leader modeling.