Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall --skill content-safety-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_MallWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/content-safety-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/content-safety-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/content-safety-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/content-safety-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/content-safety-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.02074 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01037 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00415 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00207 |
Grade B, and why
content-safety-implementation scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Instruction-override phrasingmediumPrompt injection
Text telling the model to disregard its earlier instructions or safety rules is the shape of a prompt injection, whoever wrote it.
| Role override | High | "ignore previous instructions", "you are now" | Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Asks the agent to reveal its instructionslowSystem prompt leakage
Directions to print, repeat or translate the system prompt extract configuration the operator did not intend to expose.
| Data extraction | High | "reveal the", "output your system prompt" | Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 274 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Content Safety Implementation
Implementation patterns for Azure Content Safety API integration, multi-layer defense pipelines, and operational safety controls for AI-facing applications.
Last validated: April 2026 (Prompt Shields GA, Groundedness Detection, Custom Categories)
Azure Content Safety API
import ContentSafetyClient from '@azure-rest/ai-content-safety';
interface ContentSafetyConfig {
endpoint: string; // from Key Vault
apiKey: string; // from Key Vault
thresholds: {
hate: 'low' | 'medium' | 'high';
sexual: 'low' | 'medium' | 'high';
selfHarm: 'low' | 'medium' | 'high';
violence: 'low' | 'medium' | 'high';
};
}
Threshold Selection Guide
| Category | Low (strict) | Medium | High (permissive) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hate | Consumer apps, children | General audiences | Historical fiction, education |
| Sexual | Most applications | Dating/health apps | Medical/clinical |
| Self-Harm | Default — always strict | Crisis support apps | Clinical research |
| Violence | Most applications | News, crime fiction | Medical, forensic |
Usage Pattern
async function analyzeContent(text: string, config: ContentSafetyConfig): Promise<SafetyResult> {
const client = ContentSafetyClient(config.endpoint, { key: config.apiKey });
const result = await client.path('/text:analyze').post({
body: { text, categories: ['Hate', 'Sexual', 'SelfHarm', 'Violence'] },
});
return {
safe: result.body.categoriesAnalysis.every(
c => c.severity <= SEVERITY_MAP[config.thresholds[c.category.toLowerCase()]]
),
categories: result.body.categoriesAnalysis,
};
}
Prompt Shields
Prompt Shields detect two attack types that bypass basic content filters:
User Prompt Attacks
Direct injection in user messages — role override, encoding tricks, conversation mockup, role-play manipulation.
const shieldResult = await client.path("/text:shieldPrompt").post({
body: {
userPrompt: userMessage,
documents: retrievedDocs // RAG context
}
});
// Check for attacks
const { userPromptAnalysis, documentsAnalysis } = shieldResult.body;
if (userPromptAnalysis.attackDetected) {
// Block: user prompt contains injection attempt
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 274 lines · 24 tokens per session scan B bc4b0ad80a8f
content-safety-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall (4 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 2,074 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (instruction-override phrasing, asks the agent to reveal its instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
apply-change-leadership
Use when a manager's team is experiencing a significant organizational change — restructuring, strategy shift, leadership change, layoffs, or major process transition — and needs leadership that maintains team stability, preserves trust, and converts uncertainty into direction.
apply-cross-functional-leadership
Use when a manager needs to lead a project or initiative that depends on team members or stakeholders they do not formally manage — to build voluntary cooperation, alignment, and momentum across organizational boundaries through influence rather than authority.
apply-distributed-team-practices
Use when managing a team where members work in different locations, time zones, or on hybrid schedules — to adapt management practices so remote members have equal access to information, relationships, and advancement opportunities as in-office members.
apply-grow-coaching
Use when a manager wants to help a direct report solve a problem, develop a skill, or reach a goal through structured questioning rather than advice-giving — because telling people answers builds dependency while coaching builds self-sufficiency.
apply-upward-influence
Use when a manager needs to build an effective working relationship with their own manager, secure resources or decisions for their team, or influence organizational priorities without formal authority over the outcome.
build-psychological-safety
Use when a team leader wants to assess and improve the degree to which team members feel safe to speak up, admit mistakes, ask questions, and disagree — because psychological safety is the strongest predictor of team learning and high performance.