Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall --skill literature-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_MallWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/literature-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.02265 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01132 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00453 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00227 |
Grade A, and why
literature-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 363 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: Literature Review
Systematic literature search, synthesis, gap identification, and narrative construction for academic research.
Metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Skill ID | literature-review |
| Version | 1.0.0 |
| Category | Research |
| Difficulty | Advanced |
| Prerequisites | None |
| Related Skills | academic-research, citation-management, dissertation-defense |
Overview
Literature review is foundational to academic research. This skill provides structured workflows for systematic searching, critical synthesis, and gap identification—transforming scattered sources into coherent scholarly narratives.
Core Competencies
- Systematic Search - Reproducible, comprehensive search strategies
- Critical Appraisal - Quality assessment of sources
- Synthesis - Thematic integration across sources
- Gap Identification - Locating research opportunities
- Narrative Construction - Weaving sources into argument
Module 1: Systematic Search Strategy
The PICO(S) Framework
For empirical research questions:
| Element | Description | Example (AIRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | Who is studied | Knowledge workers, AI users |
| Intervention | What is applied | AI-powered tools, copilots |
| Comparison | Alternative | Traditional tools, no AI |
| Outcome | What is measured | Adoption intention, behavioral intention |
| Study type | Research design | Quantitative survey, SEM |
Database Selection
| Database | Best For | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Google Scholar | Broad discovery, citation tracking | All disciplines |
| Web of Science | High-impact journals, citation analysis | STEM, social sciences |
| Scopus | Comprehensive coverage, author metrics | Multidisciplinary |
| ACM Digital Library | Computer science, HCI | CS, CHI proceedings |
| PsycINFO | Psychology, behavioral research | Psychology, social sciences |
| SSRN | Working papers, preprints | Business, economics, law |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 363 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 61a73ab9c3cc
literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 2,265 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
apply-change-leadership
Use when a manager's team is experiencing a significant organizational change — restructuring, strategy shift, leadership change, layoffs, or major process transition — and needs leadership that maintains team stability, preserves trust, and converts uncertainty into direction.
apply-cross-functional-leadership
Use when a manager needs to lead a project or initiative that depends on team members or stakeholders they do not formally manage — to build voluntary cooperation, alignment, and momentum across organizational boundaries through influence rather than authority.
apply-grow-coaching
Use when a manager wants to help a direct report solve a problem, develop a skill, or reach a goal through structured questioning rather than advice-giving — because telling people answers builds dependency while coaching builds self-sufficiency.
apply-upward-influence
Use when a manager needs to build an effective working relationship with their own manager, secure resources or decisions for their team, or influence organizational priorities without formal authority over the outcome.
build-psychological-safety
Use when a team leader wants to assess and improve the degree to which team members feel safe to speak up, admit mistakes, ask questions, and disagree — because psychological safety is the strongest predictor of team learning and high performance.
run-performance-improvement-plan
Use when a direct report has a documented pattern of performance falling below role expectations — after informal feedback has not produced sustained change — to create a structured, time-bound plan with clear success criteria before making a continuation decision.