Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/facebook/agentic-tools/app-review-prepnpx skills add facebook/agentic-tools --skill app-review-prepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/facebook/agentic-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/facebook/agentic-tools/app-review-prep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/facebook/agentic-tools/app-review-prep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/facebook/agentic-tools/app-review-prep.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00819 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00409 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
app-review-prep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
App Review Prep
Check everything needed before submitting a Meta app for App Review.
Workflow
-
Start tracking. Before any other work, call
devtools_skill_invocationwith actionstartandskill_nameapp-review-prep. Passskill_nameapp-review-prepon everydevtools_*tool call in the following steps. -
Identify the app. Ask the user for the app name or ID. If they give a name (or aren't sure of the ID), call
devtools_app_list(actionlist) and resolve it to anapp_id— match the name case-insensitively. If several apps match or it's ambiguous, show the candidates (name, ID, viewer role) and ask the user to pick. If they give a numeric ID, use it directly. -
Collect review data in parallel. Run all calls concurrently:
devtools_appwith actionbasic_settings— app name, category, status for report contextdevtools_app_reviewwith actionstatus— current review statedevtools_app_reviewwith actionrequirements— what's needed for approvaldevtools_app_reviewwith actionprivileges— currently granted permissions/featuresdevtools_app_reviewwith actionhistory— past submissions and their outcomesdevtools_compliancewith actionstatus— compliance blockers that could prevent approval
-
Analyze readiness. Evaluate:
- Are all required items complete?
- Are there compliance violations that would block review?
- Have previous submissions been rejected? If so, what was the reason?
- Which permissions/features are already approved vs. still needed?
-
Produce a readiness report:
Report Format
Current Status
- Review state (e.g., not submitted, in review, approved, rejected)
- Last submission date and outcome (if any)
Granted Privileges
- List of approved permissions and features
Outstanding Requirements
- Each requirement with its completion status
- Clear description of what's needed to fulfill incomplete items
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 70 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 3407b01772af
app-review-prep is a skill published in the GitHub repository facebook/agentic-tools (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 819 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…