Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/factory-ai/factory-plugins/security-reviewnpx skills add Factory-AI/factory-plugins --skill security-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Factory-AI/factory-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/factory-ai/factory-plugins/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/factory-ai/factory-plugins/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/factory-ai/factory-plugins/security-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00042 | $0.04593 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.02296 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00919 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00459 |
Grade A, and why
security-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
os.system(f"ping {user_input}") # VULNERABLE The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 572 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 5544219992d1
security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Factory-AI/factory-plugins (106 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 4,593 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Vulnerability Scanning & Assessment
Dependency auditing, CVE detection, configuration security review, CVSS scoring, and prioritized vulnerability reporting.
osv-ui
Security auditing skill for scanning CVE vulnerabilities across npm, Python, Go, and Rust projects using osv-ui. Opens a visual browser dashboard for human review, then applies fixes with explicit confirmation.
edgeone-clawscan
The first security skill to install after setting up OpenClaw — powered by Tencent Zhuque Lab. Works like an antivirus for your AI environment: audits installed skills, scans skills before installation, and performs a full OpenClaw security health check to prevent data leaks and privacy risks. Backed by Tencent Zhuque…
edgeone skill scanner
Scan any agent skill for security risks before you install or use it. Powered by Tencent Zhuque Lab A.I.G (AI-Infra-Guard). 100% local static analysis — no file contents or credentials leave your device. Compatible with CodeBuddy, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, OpenClaw and more. Triggers on: 这个 skill 安全吗, skill 安全扫描…
workflow-review
Critically review a Stencila workflow and suggest improvements. Use when asked to review, audit, critique, evaluate, or improve a workflow directory or WORKFLOW.md file. Covers frontmatter validation, DOT pipeline quality, workflow structure, agent selection quality, discovery metadata, ephemeral workflow conventions…
agent-review
Critically review a Stencila agent and suggest improvements. Use when asked to review, audit, critique, evaluate, or improve an agent directory or AGENT.md file. Covers frontmatter validation, system instruction quality, configuration correctness, and adherence to the Agent schema.