review-full

review-full is a skill for Claude Code from faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint. It costs 120 tokens per session (1,390 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A comprehensive review of recent code changes from several perspectives, including code quality, security, database behavior, and architecture when relevant.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing uncommitted changes, a specific file, a branch comparison, or security concerns such as vulnerabilities and exploitable behavior.
Why use it?
A quick review can miss problems that only appear in another part of the system, such as an insecure input path or a slow database query. This produces a go/no-go result and records each finding with its location and a suggested fix.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md.

Good fit Reviewing uncommitted changes, a specific file, a branch comparison, or security concerns such as vulnerabilities and exploitable behavior.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint/review-full
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint --skill review-full
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-full

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint/review-full/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint/review-full)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint/review-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint/review-full/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-full

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint/review-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint/review-full.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 120 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,390 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00120 $0.01390
Opus 5 $0.00060 $0.00695
Sonnet 5 $0.00024 $0.00278
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00139

Measured 10d ago against content hash d68e9242750f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-full scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/review-full/SKILL.md · 92 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

This is a COMPREHENSIVE multi-agent code review. For quick anti-pattern scanning (seconds, not minutes), use review-diff instead.

Step 0: Detect scope and project

  • If $ARGUMENTS is empty: review uncommitted changes (staged + unstaged via git diff + git diff --cached)
  • If $ARGUMENTS is a file path: review that file only
  • If $ARGUMENTS is a branch or range: review diff against that ref
  • If $ARGUMENTS is "security": run security-only review (skip to step 3)
  • Detect project type from cwd/CLAUDE.md and the project manifest (any language/framework), or fall back to inspecting the file structure

Step 1: Spawn review agents in parallel

Launch up to 4 agents based on what the changes touch:

Changes Touch Agent to Spawn Focus
Any code code-reviewer Quality, patterns, naming, DRY, error handling, consistency
API endpoints, auth, user input security-reviewer OWASP Top 10, injection, auth gaps, secrets, CORS
Database queries, ORM models, migrations db-analyst N+1, undefined vs null, missing models, query performance
New modules, moved files, cross-layer imports, large refactors architecture-reviewer Dependency direction, circular deps, god files, dead code, modularity

If changes are small (<50 lines), run code-reviewer only. If security argument, run security-reviewer only. Add architecture-reviewer when the change reshapes structure (new module boundaries, files moved across layers, a refactor spanning several directories) rather than editing within existing files.

Step 2: Code quality review (via code-reviewer agent)

The agent checks:

  • Readability and naming conventions (matches project patterns?)
  • DRY: duplicated logic that should be extracted
  • Error handling: all async paths covered? Consistent error shapes?
  • Component/function size: single responsibility?
  • Static-typing discipline where the language has it: no unchecked escapes (TypeScript any, Java raw Object, Go interface{}, etc.)

Read the full file on GitHub · 92 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 92 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A d68e9242750f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-full is a skill published in the GitHub repository faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint (70 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 1,390 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

code-review-excellence

Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.

wshobson/agents · 42 tokens

multi-reviewer-patterns

Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.

wshobson/agents · 49 tokens

chinese-code-review

A Chinese-language code-review communication guide with templates and severity levels for review comments.

jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh · 62 tokens

receiving-code-review

A guide for handling code-review feedback carefully. Code review is the process of checking proposed changes before they are accepted into a project.

jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh · 50 tokens

sdd-apply

Skill "sdd-apply" from Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai, covering execution role, language domain contract, purpose, what you receive and execution and persistence contract.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 0 tokens

gentle-ai-collab-perfect

Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the…

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 106 tokens