Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fakoli/fakoli-plugins --skill verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fakoli/fakoli-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fakoli/fakoli-plugins/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fakoli/fakoli-plugins/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fakoli/fakoli-plugins/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fakoli/fakoli-plugins/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fakoli/fakoli-plugins/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.02943 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.01177 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00589 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 324 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
In Codex, first read the native runtime adapter.
Verify (/fakoli-flow:verify)
Overview
Verification is not an opinion. It is a command you ran, output you read, and a result you can cite.
Core principle: Every PASS must cite fresh command output from this session. Every FAIL must cite what the output actually showed.
This skill is invoked:
- Automatically after
/fakoli-flow:executecompletes - Manually when the user runs
/fakoli-flow:verify - By
/fakoli-flow:quickafter the agent finishes
Step 1: Detect Project Language
Run the following to determine which verification commands apply:
# Check for language markers in order of specificity
[ -f tsconfig.json ] && echo "TypeScript"
[ -f Cargo.toml ] && echo "Rust"
{ [ -f pyproject.toml ] || [ -f setup.py ]; } && echo "Python"
| Marker file | Language |
|---|---|
tsconfig.json or package.json |
TypeScript |
Cargo.toml |
Rust |
pyproject.toml or setup.py |
Python |
If multiple markers exist, prefer the most specific: tsconfig.json > package.json.
If no marker is found: ask the user before proceeding.
Step 2: Run Language-Appropriate Checks
Run the full command for the detected language. Do not split it. Do not skip a step because the previous one passed.
TypeScript:
npx tsc --noEmit && bun test
Python:
ruff check . && mypy . && pytest
Rust:
cargo check && cargo test
Capture the full output of each command. Read exit codes. Count errors explicitly — do not skim.
Step 3: Dispatch Sentinel (if fakoli-crew is available)
If fakoli-crew is installed, dispatch the sentinel agent with the acceptance criteria from the plan.
How to find the plan:
ls docs/plans/ | sort | tail -1
Read the most recent plan file. Extract the acceptance criteria for each task (the **Acceptance criteria:** bullet points under each task heading).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines 3615ec267b94
- 1mo ago First seen · 321 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A b3ef2769949c
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository fakoli/fakoli-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 2,943 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
demo-review
Quality-checks a rendered demo video before it ships — extracts frames, grades each section against its successCriteria, and finds spinners, empty states, clipped text, exposed secrets, audio/video desync, and pacing problems. Use after a draft render, before a final render, or when asked whether a demo video is good…
accessibility-a11y
WCAG 2.2 compliance, ARIA patterns, keyboard navigation, screen readers, automated testing.
cypress-ops
Cypress end-to-end and component testing operations - selector/retry-ability strategy, cy.intercept network stubbing, cy.session auth, component vs e2e, flake diagnosis, CI, Test Replay. Use for: cypress, e2e test, component test, cy.get, cy.intercept, cy.session, data-cy, data-test, retry-ability, flake, flaky test…
github-release-management
GitHub release orchestration — automated versioning, testing, deployment, and rollback. Use when cutting a release, tagging a version, drafting release notes, or coordinating a deploy/rollback workflow.
beta-testing
Beta testing strategy for iOS/macOS apps. Covers TestFlight program setup, beta tester recruitment, feedback collection methodology, user interviews, signal-vs-noise interpretation, and go/no-go launch readiness decisions. Use when planning a beta, setting up TestFlight, collecting user feedback, or deciding if ready…
neutron-log
Measure whether a token-saving tool actually saves tokens and keeps answers correct. Use before adopting or recommending RTK, headroom, caveman or any compressor, after changing a hook or instruction file, and when someone quotes a savings percentage. Runs a same-task before and after protocol and records only…