Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/fallow-rs/fallow/github-action-reviewnpx skills add fallow-rs/fallow --skill github-action-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fallow-rs/fallowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00144 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00072 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
github-action-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
GitHub Action Review
Read:
.agents/agents/github-action-reviewer.md.agents/rules/testing.md
Review the actual changed scripts, jq filters, action definition, and tests.
Prioritize:
- shell safety
- token handling
- jq robustness on empty and malformed data
- annotation/comment correctness
- idempotent PR behavior
End with APPROVE, CONCERN, or BLOCK.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 22 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 974184921c90
github-action-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository fallow-rs/fallow (4,438 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 144 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Biome
Biome 2.x — fast all-in-one web toolchain in Rust. Formats, lints, assists. Replaces Prettier + ESLint.
eslint-docs
ESLint 10.x — flat config, rules, plugins, formatters, parsers, CLI, Node.js API, custom rules, migration.
type-inference
Use this skill when working on Biome's Salsa-backed JavaScript and TypeScript inference, including type-aware lint rules, raw collection or inferred representations, analyzer requests, tracked queries, import or cycle resolution, profiling, and Salsa invalidation tests. Do not use for standalone CSS/HTML module-graph…
biome-code-review
Use this skill only when asked to review completed Biome changes in a PR, branch, commit range, diff, or working tree. Perform a read-only static review and report findings without editing files or running project code. Do not use for triage, reproduction, or implementation.
doc-comments
Use this skill whenever writing or editing Rust //, ///, or //! comments in Biome, including comments added incidentally and end-user rustdoc inside lint/assist declarations. For lint/assist rustdoc, also load lint-rule-development for content requirements. Do not use for formatter handling of comments in user code.
migrate-oxfmt
Guide for migrating a project from Prettier or Biome to Oxfmt. Use when asked to migrate, convert, or switch a JavaScript/TypeScript project's formatter from Prettier or Biome to Oxfmt.