Fallow is a command-line static-analysis tool that builds a dependency graph of TypeScript and JavaScript code to identify unused code, duplication, circular dependencies, complexity hotspots, boundary violations, and styling drift. It is for developers reviewing codebases and verifying changes, with catalogue entries that add agent, editor, and workflow integrations.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/fallow-rs/fallow/panel-reviewnpx skills add fallow-rs/fallow --skill panel-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fallow-rs/fallowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fallow-rs/fallow/panel-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fallow-rs/fallow/panel-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fallow-rs/fallow/panel-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00200 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00100 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
panel-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Panel review
- Read the controlling plan or specification first.
- Build one evidence package from current source, live behavior, and relevant public contracts.
- Select representative users plus specialists for accessibility, security, privacy, compatibility, operations, or agent runtimes as applicable.
- Ask reviewers for concrete blockers, concerns, follow-ups, and no-action decisions.
- Verify load-bearing claims against source before accepting them.
- Synthesize consensus under:
- Fix before change
- Fix now
- Follow-up
- No action
- Record approved decisions in the active
.plans/<task>.md.
Do not expose private source text or internal review labels in public output. Panel feedback is evidence, not authority over tested contracts.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 25 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A a9ecbc0c2324
panel-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository fallow-rs/fallow (4,447 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 200 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Biome
Biome 2.x — fast all-in-one web toolchain in Rust. Formats, lints, assists. Replaces Prettier + ESLint.
eslint-docs
ESLint 10.x — flat config, rules, plugins, formatters, parsers, CLI, Node.js API, custom rules, migration.
biome-code-review
Use this skill only when asked to review completed Biome changes in a PR, branch, commit range, diff, or working tree. Perform a read-only static review and report findings without editing files or running project code. Do not use for triage, reproduction, or implementation.
doc-comments
Use this skill whenever writing or editing Rust //, ///, or //! comments in Biome, including comments added incidentally and end-user rustdoc inside lint/assist declarations. For lint/assist rustdoc, also load lint-rule-development for content requirements. Do not use for formatter handling of comments in user code.
formatter-development
Use this skill whenever implementing or debugging Biome formatter behavior, IR composition, node rules, layout selection, source-comment handling, verbatim formatting, idempotency, internal specs, or Prettier comparison. Do not use it for generic snapshot commands or parser changes.
type-inference
Use this skill when working on Biome's Salsa-backed JavaScript and TypeScript inference, including type-aware lint rules, raw collection or inferred representations, analyzer requests, tracked queries, import or cycle resolution, profiling, and Salsa invalidation tests. Do not use for standalone CSS/HTML module-graph…