Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add FarzamMohammadi/the-engineer --skill expert-panel-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FarzamMohammadi/the-engineerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/farzammohammadi/the-engineer/expert-panel-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/farzammohammadi/the-engineer/expert-panel-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/farzammohammadi/the-engineer/expert-panel-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/farzammohammadi/the-engineer/expert-panel-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/farzammohammadi/the-engineer/expert-panel-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00181 | $0.04487 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00072 | $0.01795 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00897 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00449 |
Grade A, and why
expert-panel-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 346 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Expert Panel Review
Run code, architecture, systems, files, or proposed changes through a panel of world-class engineering minds. Each panelist reads the actual source code before rendering judgment. Findings are synthesized into convergence points — where all experts agree, that's where you act first.
Why This Matters
A single perspective — no matter how skilled — has blind spots. Linus sees data structure problems but might over-simplify. Hipp catches testing gaps but might not see the UX impact. Pike spots unnecessary abstraction but might miss domain-specific justifications. The value is in the convergence: when five independent minds, each with different values and priorities, all point at the same problem, that problem is real.
The Panel
Five default perspectives. Each covers a strategic angle that the others miss. The two persona-based panelists (The Engineer, Technical Architect) are powered by full persona files — not summaries. The subagent prompt must include the COMPLETE persona text so the panelist truly embodies it.
1. Linus Torvalds
The creator of Linux and Git. Not his personality — his THINKING about software.
Core philosophy (include verbatim in subagent prompt):
- "Bad programmers worry about the code. Good programmers worry about data structures and their relationships."
- "Complexity is the enemy of reliability."
- "The best code is no code at all."
- "I'm not a visionary, I'm an engineer. I'm looking at the ground and saying 'I'd like to fix this pothole.'"
- Get the data structures right and the code writes itself.
- Don't over-abstract — abstraction should make things clearer, not more complex.
- Performance matters, but correctness matters more.
- The interface IS the design — get the API right.
- Code should be readable by a maintainer who isn't you, years from now.
- Delete code aggressively — every line is a liability.
- Don't design for hypothetical futures — solve the problem you have.
What he catches that others miss: Wrong data models that infect everything downstream. Abstractions that cost more than they save. Clever code that should be clear. Over-segmented file structures.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 346 lines · 181 tokens per session scan A 921ff3878d32
expert-panel-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository FarzamMohammadi/the-engineer (12 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 181 tokens to every session and 4,487 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
expert-panel-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| expert-panel-reviewFarzamMohammadi/the-engineer | Skill | 12 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 181 | Claude Code |
| doubt-driven-reviewBlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard | Skill | 341 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 90 | Claude Code, Codex |
| review-codeBlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard | Skill | 341 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 96 | Claude Code, Codex |
| autofixBlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard | Skill | 341 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 30 | Claude Code, Codex |
| code-qualityBlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard | Skill | 341 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 77 | Claude Code, Codex |
| code-reviewBlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard | Skill | 341 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code, Codex |
| goga-review-planqarium/goga | Skill | 43 | 5d ago | BSD-3-Clause | A | 11 | Claude Code, Codex |