claude-codex-settings is a collection of configurations and reusable extensions for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor, and related coding tools. Developers use its skills, commands, hooks, agents, plugins, and MCP servers to shape coding-agent workflows and connect alternative model APIs. The catalogue entries are components of this collection that can be installed into supported coding tools.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fcakyon/claude-codex-settings --skill debugging-livekit-agentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fcakyon/claude-codex-settingsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fcakyon/claude-codex-settings/debugging-livekit-agents)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fcakyon/claude-codex-settings/debugging-livekit-agents"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fcakyon/claude-codex-settings/debugging-livekit-agents/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fcakyon/claude-codex-settings/debugging-livekit-agents"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fcakyon/claude-codex-settings/debugging-livekit-agents.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00173 | $0.01117 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00069 | $0.00447 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00223 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
debugging-livekit-agents scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- debugging-livekit-agents — 100% identical, 43 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Debugging a LiveKit agent live
lk agent debugger runs the user's agent locally as a background process in text mode and lets
you drive a conversation one turn at a time. It's built for coding agents: you play the user,
choose each next line based on the last reply, and inspect what the agent did in between.
Speech is off and nothing goes to a LiveKit room, so a turn costs only the agent's own LLM and tool calls. That's cheap enough to use constantly while building.
Before the first use, confirm the command exists and read its help:
lk agent debugger --help
The help is thorough and is the source of truth for subcommands and flags, so this skill doesn't
restate them. If the command is missing, the installed CLI predates it. Tell the user to update
lk and use testing-livekit-agents until then. Don't guess at an older command's shape.
The loop
Start the agent, say user turns, inspect what happened, edit the code, restart, repeat, and stop when you're done. Roughly:
lk agent debugger start
lk agent debugger say "Hi, what can you do?"
lk agent debugger say "Book me a table for two tonight"
lk agent debugger stop
Each say prints everything the agent did in response (tool calls with arguments and results,
handoffs, errors) followed by the reply. Between turns you can look at the agent's chat history, a
live event stream, the process logs, and status; --help lists the subcommands.
Restart after every code edit. A running session keeps the old code, and it's easy to lose time debugging behavior the file no longer has.
Debugging with it
- Read the tool calls as well as the reply. The reply shows what went wrong; the tool call and its arguments usually show why. A wrong argument points to the prompt or the tool description. No call at all usually means the tool description never says when to use it.
- Interleave the logs when a tool misbehaves. An option shows the agent's log lines under the turn they belong to, so a tool's traceback appears right below the sanitized error the user would have heard. That's the quickest way from symptom to cause.
- Check the agent's chat history instead of relying on your memory of the conversation. It records what the LLM saw, including instruction and tool changes across handoffs. When behavior seems impossible, the history usually shows the context isn't what you assumed.
- Reproduce before you fix, then re-run the same turns. Keep the sequence of
saylines that triggered the bug so you can compare before and after. - Drive whole conversations. Most bugs take several turns to show up: details collected early that get lost, a user changing their mind mid-flow, a handoff that drops context. A single turn won't find them.
- Script it if a program is deciding the turns. There's machine-readable output and meaningful
exit codes. Check
--helpfor the current format instead of assuming field names.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago First seen · 85 lines · 173 tokens per session scan A 3bffddd7f1c4
debugging-livekit-agents is a skill published in the GitHub repository fcakyon/claude-codex-settings (1,178 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 173 tokens to every session and 1,117 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other skills, from other repositories
lov-runtime-verification
Verify client runtime fixes on actual desktop builds, physical iOS/Android devices, React Native/Flutter hosts, and deployed Web/PWA browsers with comparable workloads and lifecycle checks.
lov-wechat-parity-validation
A review workflow for checking whether a WeChat compatibility fix works across data parsing, shared meaning, interfaces, downstream uses, and the real user path. It treats regression checks as proof that the fix is complete.
lov-fix-until-no-error
A verification-focused debugging workflow that repeatedly runs specified checks, fixes the highest-priority failure, and stops when the checks pass or a genuine external blockage remains.
impact-trace
For a change point (function / type / endpoint / SQL column), enumerate its real blast radius across six dimensions with a grep citation per row, then derive the regression test scope. Every impact-table row must trace to a real search hit — never a self-asserted claim.
oma-debug
Diagnose a reproducible failure, fix its cause, and verify the regression. Use for crashes, incorrect behavior, and failing tests.
webapp-qa
Perform scoped exploratory QA of a web application, reproduce defects, collect screenshots and console evidence, and deliver a prioritized report.