Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Fearvox/multica-ultimate-workbench --skill workbench-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fearvox/multica-ultimate-workbenchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fearvox/multica-ultimate-workbench/workbench-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fearvox/multica-ultimate-workbench/workbench-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fearvox/multica-ultimate-workbench/workbench-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fearvox/multica-ultimate-workbench/workbench-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fearvox/multica-ultimate-workbench/workbench-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00338 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00135 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
workbench-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A a4ac57629d67
workbench-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Fearvox/multica-ultimate-workbench (30 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 338 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
orbit-github
Open Orbit briefing skill — selected by the Orbit pipeline when GitHub is the user's only connected connector, or when the user explicitly scopes their daily digest to GitHub. Pulls the past 24 hours of PRs, review requests, issues, CI runs, and merges from the user's authenticated GitHub connection and renders them…
diff-review
Render the patch-edit run's accumulated changes as a reviewable diff, surface it through a GenUI choice surface, and persist the user's accept / reject decision into the artifact manifest.
patch-edit
Apply one rewrite-plan step at a time as small reviewable file edits, never rewriting whole files when a localised change suffices.
critique-theater
Five-dimension design quality review — score the artifact against craft, brand, accessibility, and copy, then fix what falls short before handing it over.
dx-roaster
Brutally honest developer-experience audit for a GitHub repo. Scores 10 DX dimensions (time-to-first-success, README clarity, visual proof, install, quick-start, docs, examples, community, trust, marketing), writes a shareable roast in the requested tone (brutal/honest/kind), produces a prioritized action plan ranked…
review-feedback
Address code review/PR comments: verify each, then fix.