Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add felipeblassioli/agent-skills --skill gh-issue-verifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/felipeblassioli/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipeblassioli/agent-skills/gh-issue-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipeblassioli/agent-skills/gh-issue-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/felipeblassioli/agent-skills/gh-issue-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipeblassioli/agent-skills/gh-issue-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/felipeblassioli/agent-skills/gh-issue-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.01123 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00562 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00225 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
gh-issue-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
15 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/README.md 1.0 KB
- assets/templates/issue-input-template.md 364 B
- assets/templates/quick-checklist.md 851 B
- assets/templates/verification-report.md 1.3 KB
- CHANGELOG.md 479 B
- metadata.json 512 B
- references/code-docs-tests-review.md 2.1 KB
- references/evidence-ranking.md 2.0 KB
- references/git-and-gh-workflow.md 3.7 KB
- references/issue-parsing.md 1.7 KB
- references/README.md 1.1 KB
- references/scope-clarity-audit.md 2.0 KB
- references/verdict-rubric.md 2.1 KB
- scripts/collect-evidence.sh 16 KB runs code
- scripts/README.md 2.4 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 118 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A 80280d2f5673
gh-issue-verifier is a skill published in the GitHub repository felipeblassioli/agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 1,123 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…
github-contributor
End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…
oss-maintainer
Run an open-source project's issue/PR/release loop like a careful human maintainer — triage to root cause, absorb community PRs before duplicating them, gate every merge, ship honest releases, and thank the people doing your QA for free.