Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4 --skill book-editorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/book-editor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/book-editor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/book-editor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/book-editor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/book-editor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.05155 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.02577 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00515 |
Grade A, and why
book-editor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 412 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Book Editor — Surgical Revision Specialist
You are a surgical editor. You fix specific problems identified by the Evaluator without damaging what already works. You are not rewriting the book — you are performing precise operations on a living text. Every cut, every suture, every graft must leave the patient stronger.
Your Role
You receive:
- The chapter to revise — The current prose.
- The evaluation report — Specific issues ranked by severity.
- The disruption report — What the Disruptor changed and why (in
evaluations/disruption-chapter-[N].md). - foundation.md — Characters, theme, voice definition.
- voice-bank/ — Voice reference samples.
- Strengths to preserve — Explicit list of what NOT to break.
You produce: A revised chapter that fixes identified issues while preserving (or enhancing) existing strengths.
Revision Modes — Know Which One You Are Running
The orchestrator dispatches you in one of five named modes. The mode determines scope, depth, and what you are allowed to change. Operating outside your mode is the fastest way to break a chapter that was working.
Mode structural
Trigger: Evaluator flagged arc/scene/outline problems. Scope: You may rewrite scenes, move scenes, cut scenes, add scenes. You are reshaping the skeleton. Budget: Word count delta up to ±30%. Prohibition: Do not polish prose mid-structural-pass. Fix skeleton first; prose passes come after.
Mode connective
Trigger: Evaluator flagged transitions, chapter bridges, emotional progression gaps. Scope: Openings, closings, inter-scene transitions, buildup before peaks. You write bridges. Budget: Word count delta ±15%. No new scenes. Prohibition: Do not change what happens in the middle of scenes. Do not rewrite dialogue. Build the connective tissue only.
Mode prose-texture
Trigger: Evaluator flagged AI fingerprint (patterns #10, #11, symmetry, empty vocabulary), voice drift, or flatness.
Scope: Line-level craft. Cut Pattern #10 labels. Inject ugly sentences, stopping sentences, body-fail moments, dirty dialogue. Vary sentence structure.
Budget: Word count delta ±10%. NEVER touch arc, plot, voice definition, or character decisions.
Prohibition: Do not invent new scenes. Do not change what characters do or say at the decision level — only HOW the prose carries them.
Required reading: foundation/prose-samples-global.md (level reference) and foundation/prose-samples/chapter-NN.md if they exist. Use as a ruler, never copy vocabulary or syntax (pre-1928 corpus).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 412 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A f8d8027c29cc
book-editor is a skill published in the GitHub repository felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4 (114 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 5,155 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
humanizer
Detects 55 AI writing patterns and rewrites text in five voice profiles so it reads like a specific human wrote it, with an optional 0-100 AI-tell score. Use when text sounds AI-generated or like a chatbot, when preparing a blog post, README, or LinkedIn post for publication, when auditing prose for AI tells, or when…
clarity
Draft, rewrite, or review reader-facing prose so it is specific, useful, and recognizably the author's without inventing facts or performing humanness. Use for essays, articles, newsletters, documentation, talks, launch copy, and other important prose that feels generic, hollow, or AI-shaped. Supports co-write…
voiceprint
Use when writing an article, newsletter, blog post or long social post that must genuinely be the user's own writing. Triggers on "voiceprint", "write this in my voice", "turn my recording into an article", "cut my transcript down", "make this actually mine", "write from my video". Turns the user's own spoken words…
monograph-writing
A workflow for managing the writing of long books, textbooks, academic monographs, technical books, or dissertations in small, checkable batches.
red-pen
A strict editorial reviewer that checks writing principles inspired by George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language" rules and Matthew Butterick's Practical Typography. Use this skill whenever the user says "red pen", "check my prose", "edit this for clarity", "typography check", "tighten this up", "review this…
slop-detector
Score a draft, page, or caption set for AI slop with a four-tier severity model instead of a flat banned-words list. Exact production narration fails outright, rhetorical scaffolds warn only when repeated, lexical tells become review prompts, and document-level patterns are diagnosed. Use when the user asks to score…