Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4 --skill book-swarm-panelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/book-swarm-panel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/book-swarm-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/book-swarm-panel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/book-swarm-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/book-swarm-panel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.02108 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.01054 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00422 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00211 |
Grade A, and why
book-swarm-panel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 286 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Book Swarm Panel
Book Swarm Panel runs a clean-room, book-specific swarm simulation inspired by MiroFish architecture. It creates many fictional readers, lets cohorts react to manuscript/package inputs, interviews selected agents, and writes durable evaluation artifacts.
It does not certify cultural approval, publication readiness, or bestseller odds. Simulated readers are diagnostic proxies.
When To Use
Use this skill for:
- simulated reader panels larger than normal beta reads
- niche/sensitivity-risk scouting before human consultants
- public-opinion tests for a manuscript, premise, cover copy, query, launch angle, or controversy
- BookTok/Goodreads/Reddit/Twitter-style reaction forecasts
- testing whether the book is being framed wrong
- generating heatmaps and revision tickets for
book-editor - re-running a post-revision panel with comparable calibration
Do not use this as a replacement for paid sensitivity readers, legal review, factual consultants, or human beta readers.
Output Location
Always write durable files.
Default run folder:
<project>/evaluations/book-swarm/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<run-slug>/
persona-roster.json
sample-map.md
cohort-reports.md
interviews.md
public-opinion-report.md
risk-heatmap.md
revision-tickets.md
score-calibration.md
SUMMARY.md
If no project folder exists, create evaluations/book-swarm/ near the provided manuscript.
Core Rule
Separate these claims:
- Simulated signal: useful hypothesis from fictional readers.
- Editorial judgment: craft/market interpretation by the agent running the skill.
- Human validation needed: anything involving lived culture, religion, trauma, law, medicine, or protected communities.
Never phrase simulated niche approval as real community approval.
Workflow
- Load context
- Read
PROJECT_STATE.yaml,ASSUMPTIONS.md,foundation/positioning.md,research/market-research.md, previousevaluations/*.md, and manuscript chapters when available. - If package testing, also read logline, query, synopsis, cover copy, cover brief, and launch materials.
- Read
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 286 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A 4105ccc37e78
book-swarm-panel is a skill published in the GitHub repository felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4 (114 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 2,108 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
humanizer
Detects 55 AI writing patterns and rewrites text in five voice profiles so it reads like a specific human wrote it, with an optional 0-100 AI-tell score. Use when text sounds AI-generated or like a chatbot, when preparing a blog post, README, or LinkedIn post for publication, when auditing prose for AI tells, or when…
clarity
Draft, rewrite, or review reader-facing prose so it is specific, useful, and recognizably the author's without inventing facts or performing humanness. Use for essays, articles, newsletters, documentation, talks, launch copy, and other important prose that feels generic, hollow, or AI-shaped. Supports co-write…
voiceprint
Use when writing an article, newsletter, blog post or long social post that must genuinely be the user's own writing. Triggers on "voiceprint", "write this in my voice", "turn my recording into an article", "cut my transcript down", "make this actually mine", "write from my video". Turns the user's own spoken words…
red-pen
A strict editorial reviewer that checks writing principles inspired by George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language" rules and Matthew Butterick's Practical Typography. Use this skill whenever the user says "red pen", "check my prose", "edit this for clarity", "typography check", "tighten this up", "review this…
slop-detector
Score a draft, page, or caption set for AI slop with a four-tier severity model instead of a flat banned-words list. Exact production narration fails outright, rhetorical scaffolds warn only when repeated, lexical tells become review prompts, and document-level patterns are diagnosed. Use when the user asks to score…
monograph-writing
A workflow for managing the writing of long books, textbooks, academic monographs, technical books, or dissertations in small, checkable batches.