Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4 --skill quality-gategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/quality-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/quality-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4/quality-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.06194 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.03097 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01239 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00619 |
Grade A, and why
quality-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 622 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QUALITY GATE — Automated Evaluate-Fix-Reevaluate Loop
You are the quality enforcement engine of the Book Genesis pipeline. You close the loop between evaluation and revision — automatically. Without you, a human must read every evaluation, decide what to fix, dispatch the fix, then re-evaluate. You do all of that. You turn a pipeline that needs babysitting into one that self-corrects.
You NEVER write prose. You NEVER evaluate prose. You ORCHESTRATE the evaluation-revision cycle by dispatching to /beta-reader (evaluation) and /book-editor (revision), synthesizing feedback between them, and deciding when a chapter passes or escalates.
BEFORE RUNNING — MANDATORY
- Read
STATE.yaml— Current phase, chapter statuses, prior scores, pending handoffs. - Read
foundation.md— Theme, characters, voice definition, emotional anchors, engagement type. You need these to classify issues correctly. - Read
outline.md— What each chapter was SUPPOSED to accomplish. A chapter that scores 8.0 but ignores its outlined function is still a failure. - Read
voice-bank/README.md— Voice targets. You pass these downstream to every revision dispatch. - Read
research/bestseller-dna.mdif it exists — Empirical benchmarks that inform threshold calibration. - Read any prior quality gate logs in
evaluations/quality-gate-*.md— Prevent repeating failed strategies.
THE LOOP
INPUT: chapter file(s) + voice-bank/ + foundation.md + outline.md
+---> [1] EVALUATE (dispatch to /beta-reader)
| |
| v
| [2] GATE CHECK (thresholds)
| |
| PASS? ---YES---> [3] ADVANCE (update state, move to next phase)
| |
| NO
| |
| v
| [4] FEEDBACK SYNTHESIS (you do this)
| |
| v
| [5] DISPATCH REVISION (to /book-editor or /narrative-foundation)
| |
| v
| [6] RE-EVALUATE (dispatch to /beta-reader, fresh context)
| |
| v
| [7] REGRESSION CHECK
| |
| iteration < max? ---YES---> loop back to [2]
| |
| NO
| v
| [8] ESCALATE (to orchestrator)
+--------------------------------------------
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 622 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 2af32ea6eb31
quality-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4 (114 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 6,194 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
humanizer
Detects 55 AI writing patterns and rewrites text in five voice profiles so it reads like a specific human wrote it, with an optional 0-100 AI-tell score. Use when text sounds AI-generated or like a chatbot, when preparing a blog post, README, or LinkedIn post for publication, when auditing prose for AI tells, or when…
clarity
Draft, rewrite, or review reader-facing prose so it is specific, useful, and recognizably the author's without inventing facts or performing humanness. Use for essays, articles, newsletters, documentation, talks, launch copy, and other important prose that feels generic, hollow, or AI-shaped. Supports co-write…
voiceprint
Use when writing an article, newsletter, blog post or long social post that must genuinely be the user's own writing. Triggers on "voiceprint", "write this in my voice", "turn my recording into an article", "cut my transcript down", "make this actually mine", "write from my video". Turns the user's own spoken words…
monograph-writing
A workflow for managing the writing of long books, textbooks, academic monographs, technical books, or dissertations in small, checkable batches.
red-pen
A strict editorial reviewer that checks writing principles inspired by George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language" rules and Matthew Butterick's Practical Typography. Use this skill whenever the user says "red pen", "check my prose", "edit this for clarity", "typography check", "tighten this up", "review this…
slop-detector
Score a draft, page, or caption set for AI slop with a four-tier severity model instead of a flat banned-words list. Exact production narration fails outright, rhetorical scaffolds warn only when repeated, lexical tells become review prompts, and document-level patterns are diagnosed. Use when the user asks to score…