CCG is a command-line workflow engine that coordinates Claude, Codex, Gemini, and other models as specialized collaborators on coding tasks. It is used to analyze requests, choose a strategy, delegate work to model-specific roles, and combine their results. The catalogue entries provide the skills, commands, agents, and plugin that implement this workflow.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to fengshao1227/ccg-workflow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fengshao1227/ccg-workflow/main/.agents/skills/openspec-sync-specs/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fengshao1227/ccg-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fengshao1227/ccg-workflow/openspec-sync-specs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fengshao1227/ccg-workflow/openspec-sync-specs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fengshao1227/ccg-workflow/openspec-sync-specs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fengshao1227/ccg-workflow/openspec-sync-specs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fengshao1227/ccg-workflow/openspec-sync-specs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01025 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00513 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00205 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
openspec-sync-specs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to openspec-sync-specs — 21 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sync delta specs from a change to main specs.
This is an agent-driven operation - you will read delta specs and directly edit main specs to apply the changes. This allows intelligent merging (e.g., adding a scenario without copying the entire requirement).
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
-
If no change name provided, prompt for selection
Run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes. Use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select.Show changes that have delta specs (under
specs/directory).IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.
-
Find delta specs
Look for delta spec files in
openspec/changes/<name>/specs/*/spec.md.Each delta spec file contains sections like:
## ADDED Requirements- New requirements to add## MODIFIED Requirements- Changes to existing requirements## REMOVED Requirements- Requirements to remove## RENAMED Requirements- Requirements to rename (FROM:/TO: format)
If no delta specs found, inform user and stop.
-
For each delta spec, apply changes to main specs
For each capability with a delta spec at
openspec/changes/<name>/specs/<capability>/spec.md:a. Read the delta spec to understand the intended changes
b. Read the main spec at
openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md(may not exist yet)c. Apply changes intelligently:
ADDED Requirements:
- If requirement doesn't exist in main spec → add it
- If requirement already exists → update it to match (treat as implicit MODIFIED)
MODIFIED Requirements:
- Find the requirement in main spec
- Apply the changes - this can be:
- Adding new scenarios (don't need to copy existing ones)
- Modifying existing scenarios
- Changing the requirement description
- Preserve scenarios/content not mentioned in the delta
REMOVED Requirements:
- Remove the entire requirement block from main spec
RENAMED Requirements:
- Find the FROM requirement, rename to TO
d. Create new main spec if capability doesn't exist yet:
- Create
openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md - Add Purpose section (can be brief, mark as TBD)
- Add Requirements section with the ADDED requirements
-
Show summary
After applying all changes, summarize:
- Which capabilities were updated
- What changes were made (requirements added/modified/removed/renamed)
Delta Spec Format Reference
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: New Feature
The system SHALL do something new.
#### Scenario: Basic case
- **WHEN** user does X
- **THEN** system does Y
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Existing Feature
#### Scenario: New scenario to add
- **WHEN** user does A
- **THEN** system does B
## REMOVED Requirements
### Requirement: Deprecated Feature
## RENAMED Requirements
- FROM: `### Requirement: Old Name`
- TO: `### Requirement: New Name`
Key Principle: Intelligent Merging
Unlike programmatic merging, you can apply partial updates:
- To add a scenario, just include that scenario under MODIFIED - don't copy existing scenarios
- The delta represents intent, not a wholesale replacement
- Use your judgment to merge changes sensibly
Output On Success
## Specs Synced: <change-name>
Updated main specs:
**<capability-1>**:
- Added requirement: "New Feature"
- Modified requirement: "Existing Feature" (added 1 scenario)
**<capability-2>**:
- Created new spec file
- Added requirement: "Another Feature"
Main specs are now updated. The change remains active - archive when implementation is complete.
Guardrails
- Read both delta and main specs before making changes
- Preserve existing content not mentioned in delta
- If something is unclear, ask for clarification
- Show what you're changing as you go
- The operation should be idempotent - running twice should give same result
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 139 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 78a33a6c94ce
openspec-sync-specs is a skill published in the GitHub repository fengshao1227/ccg-workflow (5,879 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,025 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to openspec-sync-specs, differing in 21 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-workflow
Review a change in a fixed order — context, correctness, security, then style — and write feedback that is actionable and ranked by severity. Use when the user asks for a code review, wants a pull request or diff reviewed before merge, asks whether a change is safe to ship, or when the task involves reviewing a patch…
refactoring-workflow
Improve the structure of existing code without changing its behaviour, in small verified steps under a green test suite. Use when the user asks to refactor, clean up, restructure or simplify code, wants to reduce duplication or coupling, is preparing a codebase for a feature it cannot currently accommodate, or when…
airflow-expert
Expert-level Apache Airflow orchestration, DAGs, operators, sensors, XComs, task dependencies, and scheduling. Use when the user mentions orchestration, DAGs, workflow, scheduling, or data pipeline, or when the task involves DAG Fundamentals, Task Dependencies and Branching, Dynamic Task Generation, or Operators and…
git-expert
Expert-level Git version control with advanced workflows, branching strategies, and best practices for team collaboration. Use when the user mentions version control, collaboration, or workflow, or when the task involves Essential Git Commands, Advanced Git Techniques, Branching Strategies, or Conflict Resolution.
absolute-simplify
Use when the user wants to simplify, clean up, refactor, tidy, or refine code — their staged/unstaged git changes or a target file/path. Reduces complexity, flattens nesting, removes redundancy and dead code, scores each change by value (holding low-value churn), then runs tests to prove nothing broke. Invoke on…
absolute-ui
Build polished, intentional UIs with concrete CSS/Tailwind values — typography, color, layout, spacing, dark mode, accessibility, animations, components. Encodes specific, opinionated rules with exact values, not vague advice. Covers buttons, cards, forms, tables, navigation, dashboards, landing pages, onboarding, and…