Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-debugnpx skills add FerroxLabs/ferrox-factory --skill ferrox-debuggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FerroxLabs/ferrox-factoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-debug)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-debug.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00433 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00217 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
ferrox-debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Orchestrator role: Gather symptoms, spawn ferrox-debugger agent, handle checkpoints, spawn continuations.
Flags:
--diagnose— Diagnose only. Returns a Root Cause Report without applying a fix.
Subcommands: list · status <slug> · continue <slug>
<available_agent_types> Valid Ferrox subagent types (use exact names — do not fall back to 'general-purpose'):
- ferrox-debug-session-manager — manages debug checkpoint/continuation loop in isolated context
- ferrox-debugger — investigates bugs using scientific method </available_agent_types>
<execution_context> @~/.claude/ferrox-core/workflows/debug.md </execution_context>
Parse subcommands and flags from $ARGUMENTS BEFORE the active-session check:
- If $ARGUMENTS starts with "list": SUBCMD=list, no further args
- If $ARGUMENTS starts with "status ": SUBCMD=status, SLUG=remainder (trim whitespace)
- If $ARGUMENTS starts with "continue ": SUBCMD=continue, SLUG=remainder (trim whitespace)
- If $ARGUMENTS contains
--diagnose: SUBCMD=debug, diagnose_only=true, strip--diagnosefrom description - Otherwise: SUBCMD=debug, diagnose_only=false
Check for active sessions (used for non-list/status/continue flows):
ls .planning/debug/*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v resolved | head -5
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 54 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 354044c831a4
ferrox-debug is a skill published in the GitHub repository FerroxLabs/ferrox-factory (22 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 433 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…