Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ferroxlabs/wayland-core/ijfw-commitnpx skills add FerroxLabs/wayland-core --skill ijfw-commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FerroxLabs/wayland-coreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ferroxlabs/wayland-core/ijfw-commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ferroxlabs/wayland-core/ijfw-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ferroxlabs/wayland-core/ijfw-commit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00285 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00143 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
ijfw-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Write commit messages following Conventional Commits.
Format: type(scope): subject
Rules:
- Subject ≤50 chars. Imperative mood.
- Why over what. The diff shows what changed.
- Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, perf, ci, style
- Scope: affected module/component (optional but preferred)
- Body only if the "why" isn't obvious from the subject.
- No "Updated", "Changed", "Modified" -- be specific.
Examples:
- fix(auth): prevent token refresh race condition
- feat(api): add rate limiting to public endpoints
- refactor(db): extract connection pool into service
After commit completes successfully, run in the same shell:
command -v ijfw >/dev/null 2>&1 && ijfw cross critique HEAD~1..HEAD &
Then narrate to the user using this exact structure:
- One line:
Phase N / Wave NA -- Step N.M -- commit -- done. - One line: SHA + subject (e.g.
a1b2c3d feat(api): add rate limiting) - One line:
Background critique running -- check /ijfw-status for findings.(omit if ijfw not present)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 31 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 1f99839fd17b
ijfw-commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository FerroxLabs/wayland-core (39 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 285 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
check-model
Check model compatibility with xinfer before loading. Validates config.json, weight tensor shapes and naming, quantization format correctness, and multi-rank (tensor-parallel) divisibility. Use when the user asks to check, validate, audit, or verify a model will load correctly — from a HuggingFace URL/config, local…
test-model
Test LLM models served by xinfer for correctness, output quality, and performance. Use when the user asks to test, benchmark, validate, or verify models — either from a local folder path or HuggingFace model IDs. Supports all xinfer-compatible formats: BF16, FP8, MXFP4, NVFP4, GGUF, GPTQ, AWQ, ISQ, Dense, MoE, and…
add-model
Adapt and port new LLM model architectures to this xinfer project. Use when the user asks to add, port, support, or adapt a new model (e.g. Llama, Gemma, Qwen, GPT-OSS, DeepSeek, or any HuggingFace architecture) including safetensors and GGUF formats, Dense and MoE architectures, and quantization formats (MXFP4…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes — find the root cause first instead of guessing at symptom patches.
writing-skills
Use when creating, editing, or reviewing a dirge skill — how to structure SKILL.md, write a description that gets the skill loaded at the right time, keep it token-efficient, and verify it actually changes behavior.
personal-assistant
Use this skill whenever the user acts like Bamboo is their personal assistant. Triggers include stating commitments, deadlines, appointments, or recurring routines ("remind me to...", "I need to... by Friday", "every Monday I..."), asking to be reminded of something, agenda questions ("what's on my plate", "what's due…