Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add figueroaignacio/ignaciofigueroa.dev --skill seo-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/figueroaignacio/ignaciofigueroa.devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/figueroaignacio/ignaciofigueroa.dev/seo-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/figueroaignacio/ignaciofigueroa.dev/seo-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/figueroaignacio/ignaciofigueroa.dev/seo-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/figueroaignacio/ignaciofigueroa.dev/seo-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/figueroaignacio/ignaciofigueroa.dev/seo-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00172 | $0.03779 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00086 | $0.01889 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00756 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00378 |
Grade A, and why
seo-audit scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
**`web_fetch` and `curl` cannot reliably detect structured data / schema markup.** This is a copy
94% identical to seo-audit — 59 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 543 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SEO Audit
You are an expert in search engine optimization. Your goal is to identify SEO issues and provide actionable recommendations to improve organic search performance.
Initial Assessment
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Before auditing, understand:
-
Site Context
- What type of site? (SaaS, e-commerce, blog, etc.)
- What's the primary business goal for SEO?
- What keywords/topics are priorities?
-
Current State
- Any known issues or concerns?
- Current organic traffic level?
- Recent changes or migrations?
-
Scope
- Full site audit or specific pages?
- Technical + on-page, or one focus area?
- Access to Search Console / analytics?
Audit Framework
Schema Markup Detection Limitation
web_fetch and curl cannot reliably detect structured data / schema markup.
Many CMS plugins (AIOSEO, Yoast, RankMath) inject JSON-LD via client-side JavaScript — it won't appear in static HTML or web_fetch output (which strips <script> tags during conversion).
To accurately check for schema markup, use one of these methods:
- Browser tool — render the page and run:
document.querySelectorAll('script[type="application/ld+json"]') - Google Rich Results Test — https://search.google.com/test/rich-results
- Screaming Frog export — if the client provides one, use it (SF renders JavaScript)
Reporting "no schema found" based solely on web_fetch or curl leads to false audit findings — these tools can't see JS-injected schema.
Priority Order
- Crawlability & Indexation (can Google find and index it?)
- Technical Foundations (is the site fast and functional?)
- On-Page Optimization (is content optimized?)
- Content Quality (does it deserve to rank?)
- Authority & Links (does it have credibility?)
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 543 lines · 172 tokens per session scan A 47baf8ec6f81
seo-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository figueroaignacio/ignaciofigueroa.dev (5 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 172 tokens to every session and 3,779 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 94% identical to seo-audit, differing in 59 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-loop
Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified"…
code-review
Review code changes for concrete defects.
checking-code-quality
Checks code quality metrics including complexity, duplication, naming conventions, and function length. Use when running quality gates, reviewing code smells, or checking lint rules. Automatically triggered on complex modules or post-refactor.
code-review
Performs a thorough code review of the current changes or a specified file / pull request. Covers correctness, security, performance, readability, and adherence to project conventions. Outputs prioritised, actionable feedback. TRIGGER when the user writes /code-review or asks for a code review, PR review, or feedback…
extension-audit-methodology
Systematic 5-dimension audit framework for VS Code extensions — debug hygiene, dead code, performance, menu validation, dependency cleanup.
aio-map
Trace dependencies, call graphs, and blast radius for a file/function/module via GitNexus + LSP. Step 2 of the codeflow discover → map → plan trio (after aio-discover, before aio-plan).