Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/main/.cursor/skills/compile-report/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/compile-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/compile-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/compile-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/compile-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/compile-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00490 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00196 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
compile-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Compile Report
Synthesize all individual reviewer assessments into one unified, comprehensive, actionable review report.
Prerequisites
Before compiling, read ALL individual review files from the report directory:
<report-directory>/05-scope-review.md<report-directory>/06-methodology-review.md<report-directory>/07-writing-style-review.md<report-directory>/08-statistics-review.md<report-directory>/09-ethics-review.md
If any file is missing, note the gap in the report but compile what is available.
Compilation Guidelines
Synthesize, Don't Copy
- Read all reviews and create a cohesive narrative
- Resolve contradictions between reviewers fairly
- Present the most critical issues upfront
Prioritize Issues
- Rank issues by impact on acceptance/rejection
- Distinguish between blocking issues (must fix) and improvements (should fix)
- Consider the journal's typical threshold when making recommendations
Be Fair
- Highlight strengths as well as weaknesses
- Don't let one weak dimension dominate the entire assessment
- Consider the overall balance of issues
Determining the Recommendation
- ACCEPT: All dimensions ≥ 4/5, no blocking issues
- REVISE (MINOR): Most dimensions ≥ 4/5, minor issues addressable in revision
- REVISE (MAJOR): Several dimensions 3/5, significant issues needing substantial work
- REJECT: Multiple dimensions ≤ 2/5, fundamental problems, or scope misfit
Handle Contradictions
If reviewers disagree: present both perspectives, note the disagreement explicitly, and provide your own assessment.
Overall Rating
Calculate the overall rating as the mean of all dimension ratings. Use trend icons:
- ✅ (4–5): Strong, no major concerns
- ⚠️ (3): Adequate with concerns
- ❌ (1–2): Problematic, needs significant work
Output Location
Save to <report-directory>/10-final-review-report.md, then generate the PDF using the generate-pdf skill.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A e7f8642e68a9
compile-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 490 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
compile-report compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| compile-reportFilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer | Skill | 3 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code, Cursor |
| wiki-ingestAvalancheAI-labs/agent-wiki-kit | Skill | 0 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 77 | Claude Code, Codex |
| ingest-wikipanamini/Pagecraft | Skill | 2 | 6mo ago | GPL-3.0 | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| ingest-wikipanamini/Pagecraft | Skill | 2 | 6mo ago | GPL-3.0 | A | 114 | Claude Code |
| karpathy-guidelinespanamini/Pagecraft | Skill | 2 | 6mo ago | GPL-3.0 | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarkingsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | Skill | 49k | yesterday | MIT | A | 31 | Claude Code |
| implement-outlinehumanlayer/humanlayer | Skill | 13k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 15 | Claude Code, Codex |