agentmods.dev

agentic-reviewer: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/review-paper/SKILL.md

review-paper is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer. It costs 21 tokens per session (386 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A complete workflow for reviewing an academic paper against the requirements of a named journal or conference.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when you have a paper and target publication and need a structured peer-review report.
Why use it?
It organizes journal research and checks the paper’s scope, methods, writing, statistics, and ethics in one report.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on agentic-reviewer itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything agentic-reviewer configures →

not rated 3repo 4mo ago A scan 21 tokens original MIT
View source ↗ FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer
Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/main/.agents/skills/review-paper/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-paper

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-paper/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-paper)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-paper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-paper

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-paper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 21 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 386 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00021 $0.00386
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00154
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00077
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00039

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 499ab71ba265, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-paper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/review-paper/SKILL.md · 52 lines

What it actually says

Review Paper

Run the repository's paper review workflow from prompts/editor-in-chief.txt.

Inputs required from the user:

  • Paper path, usually under papers/
  • Target journal or conference name

If either input is missing, ask for it before starting.

Workflow

  1. Create reports/<journal-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS>/.
  2. Write 00-session-info.md.
  3. If the paper is not Markdown, use the paper-converter agent to convert it.
  4. Check context/<journal-slug>/ for cached journal context.
  5. Unless the user says re-explore, reuse cached context only when all four files exist:
    • scope-and-criteria.md
    • recent-papers-analysis.md
    • style-guide.md
    • reputation-profile.md
  6. If context is missing, stale, or incomplete, run only the exploration agents needed to produce missing or stale files:
    • scope-explorer
    • recent-papers-explorer
    • style-guide-explorer
    • reputation-explorer
  7. After exploration is complete, run the reviewer agents:
    • scope-reviewer
    • methodology-reviewer
    • writing-style-reviewer
    • statistics-reviewer
    • ethics-reviewer
  8. After all reviewer outputs exist, use report-compiler.

Output Contract

All session artifacts must be written to the timestamped report directory:

reports/<journal-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS>/

Do not write review artifacts to reviews/.

Do not commit changes unless the user explicitly asks.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 52 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 499ab71ba265

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-paper is a skill published in the GitHub repository FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 386 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

LLMResearchacademicagentsaimarkdownmarkitdown
Related

review-paper compared with skills from other repositories

review-paper next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
review-paperFilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewerSkill34mo agoMITA21Claude Code, Codex
wiki-ingestAvalancheAI-labs/agent-wiki-kitSkill02mo agoMITA77Claude Code, Codex
ingest-wikipanamini/PagecraftSkill26mo agoGPL-3.0A68Claude Code
ingest-wikipanamini/PagecraftSkill26mo agoGPL-3.0A114Claude Code
karpathy-guidelinespanamini/PagecraftSkill26mo agoGPL-3.0A46Claude Code
ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarkingsickn33/agentic-awesome-skillsSkill49kyesterdayMITA31Claude Code
implement-outlinehumanlayer/humanlayerSkill13kyesterdayApache-2.0A15Claude Code, Codex