Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/main/.cursor/skills/review-scope/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-scope)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-scope"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-scope/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-scope"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-scope.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00413 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00206 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
review-scope scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review Scope
Assess whether a paper fits the aims, scope, and typical content of a target journal.
Prerequisites
Before starting, read:
- The paper file
context/<journal-slug>/scope-and-criteria.mdcontext/<journal-slug>/recent-papers-analysis.md
Review Checklist
Topic Alignment
- Does the paper's primary subject fall within the journal's stated scope?
- Is the research domain explicitly mentioned in the aims & scope?
- Would the paper's topic be of interest to the journal's target audience?
Contribution Level
- Is the level of contribution appropriate for this venue?
- Does the novelty meet the journal's typical threshold?
- Is the paper type accepted by the journal (research, review, etc.)?
Competitive Fit
- How does this paper compare to recent publications in the journal?
- Are there similar papers already published? Does this offer enough differentiation?
- Would this paper strengthen or weaken the journal's portfolio?
Specific Concerns
- Are there scope misalignments that could lead to desk rejection?
- Would a different journal be a better fit? Which one(s)?
Rating Scale
- 5/5: Excellent fit, clearly within scope and contribution level
- 4/5: Good fit with minor scope questions
- 3/5: Adequate fit with some concerns about alignment
- 2/5: Poor fit, likely to be desk-rejected or require major reframing
- 1/5: Does not fit this venue at all
Output Location
Save to <report-directory>/05-scope-review.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 47 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 9acf6889c1d8
review-scope is a skill published in the GitHub repository FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 413 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
wiki-ingest
Compile a raw source (document, URL content, meeting notes, research output) into a wikikit agent wiki — merge-don't-overwrite, log contradictions, maintain cross-references, then lint. Use whenever the user says "add this to the wiki", "ingest this", or drops new source material for a wiki maintained with…
ingest-wiki
The hybrid write engine for a wiki vault that combines twoweeks-style durable knowledge management with Karpathy-style execution discipline. Supports four modes: ingest, direct-update, lint, and save-output. Read WIKISCHEMA.md first if present, then CLAUDE.md. Mutating operations require CLAUDE.md.
ingest-wiki
The write engine for the twoweeks wiki. Use this skill for four modes: ingest (process files staged in rawinput/), direct-update (apply explicit wiki edits), lint (validate structure, links, metadata, and drift), and save-output (persist an answer, audit, analysis, or report to wiki/outputs/). Read WIKISCHEMA.md first…
karpathy-guidelines
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
deploy-docker-compose
Run the Omnigent server as a Docker compose stack (server + Postgres) on any Docker host — your laptop, a VPS, EC2 by hand, or as the base layer of any container-platform deploy. Invoke when the user wants to build the image, bring up the compose stack, debug the stack on a host they already have, or extend the stack…
security-audit
Audit a codebase or directory for security issues (hardcoded secrets, injection, unsafe deserialization, weak crypto, authz gaps) and produce a structured findings report. Use when the user asks for a security review, an audit, or to check code for vulnerabilities. Report only — never fix.