agentmods.dev

agentic-reviewer: Skill for Claude Code

.cursor/skills/review-writing-style/SKILL.md

review-writing-style is a skill for Claude Code, Cursor from FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer. It costs 44 tokens per session (728 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review guide for the writing and organization of an academic paper written in Markdown, a plain-text document format. It covers clarity, structure, grammar, arguments, abstracts, figures, tables, and references.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for checking whether a paper is readable, logically organized, grammatically sound, complete in its required sections, and clear about its methods, results, figures, tables, and sources.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers assess the paper's writing quality and journal-specific requirements without judging layout features that Markdown does not control.

Skill for Claude CodeCursor

Written for Claude Code and Cursor: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter, but also installed under .cursor/.

This is FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Cursor how to work on agentic-reviewer itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything agentic-reviewer configures →

not rated 3repo 4mo ago A scan 44 tokens original MIT
View source ↗ FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer
Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/main/.cursor/skills/review-writing-style/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer

Made for: Claude Code, Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-writing-style

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-writing-style/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-writing-style)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-writing-style"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-writing-style/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-writing-style

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-writing-style"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/filipposcaramuzza/agentic-reviewer/review-writing-style.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 728 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.00728
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00291
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00146
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00073

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 8af57f24844f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-writing-style scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/skills/review-writing-style/SKILL.md · 81 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Writing Style

Assess the writing quality, clarity, structure, and content-level style of an academic paper. The paper is in Markdown format, so formatting checks (fonts, margins, DPI, page layout) are not applicable.

Prerequisites

Before starting, read:

  1. The paper file
  2. context/<journal-slug>/style-guide.md (journal content and structural expectations)

What to Review

Focus On (content-level)

  • Clarity & Readability: Is the writing clear, concise, and appropriate for the audience?
  • Structure & Organization: Does the paper follow a logical structure? Does it have the sections the journal expects?
  • Grammar & Language: Are there grammatical errors, awkward phrasing, or inconsistent terminology?
  • Content-Level Style Compliance: Required sections present? Appropriate length for the journal? Abstract style?
  • Abstract Quality: Does the abstract cover the key elements (background, methods, results, conclusions)?
  • Argumentation & Flow: Does the paper present a coherent argument from introduction through conclusion?
  • Figures & Tables Description: Are they well-described and referenced in text?
  • References: Are references comprehensive, current, and covering key works in the field?

Do NOT Review (formatting-level, lost in Markdown)

  • Font, font size, or typeface
  • Margin sizes or page layout
  • Figure resolution or file format requirements
  • Line spacing or paragraph indentation
  • Reference formatting style — assess completeness only, not format

Checklist

Clarity & Readability

  • Is the writing clear and concise?
  • Is jargon used appropriately for the target audience?
  • Are complex ideas explained accessibly?

Structure & Organization

  • Does the paper have the sections the journal expects?
  • Are sections well-organized with clear transitions?
  • Is the narrative coherent from introduction through conclusion?

Grammar & Language

  • Are there grammatical errors?
  • Is terminology used consistently?
  • Is the language appropriate for an academic context?

Read the full file on GitHub · 81 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 81 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 8af57f24844f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-writing-style is a skill published in the GitHub repository FilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewer (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 728 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

LLMWriting and docsacademicagentsaimarkdownmarkitdown
Related

review-writing-style compared with skills from other repositories

review-writing-style next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
review-writing-styleFilippoScaramuzza/agentic-reviewerSkill34mo agoMITA44Claude Code, Cursor
wiki-ingestAvalancheAI-labs/agent-wiki-kitSkill02mo agoMITA77Claude Code, Codex
ingest-wikipanamini/PagecraftSkill26mo agoGPL-3.0A68Claude Code
ingest-wikipanamini/PagecraftSkill26mo agoGPL-3.0A114Claude Code
karpathy-guidelinespanamini/PagecraftSkill26mo agoGPL-3.0A46Claude Code
ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarkingsickn33/agentic-awesome-skillsSkill49kyesterdayMITA31Claude Code
implement-outlinehumanlayer/humanlayerSkill13kyesterdayApache-2.0A15Claude Code, Codex