xmind

xmind is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from FirenzeClaw/kimi-session-orchestrator. It costs 53 tokens per session (2,399 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A skill that asks for an independent second view when a coding problem remains stuck or an architecture choice has no clear answer. It gathers project context and passes it to another agent for a broader review, with up to three rounds when suggestions are rejected.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing stubborn bugs, architecture conflicts, priorities hidden by implementation details, and requests for a substantially different solution.
Why use it?
It helps break repeated debugging loops and exposes trade-offs that can be hard to see when one agent stays focused on its original approach.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions subagents; mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit It is for reviewing stubborn bugs, architecture conflicts, priorities hidden by implementation details, and requests for a substantially different solution.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/firenzeclaw/kimi-session-orchestrator/xmind
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add FirenzeClaw/kimi-session-orchestrator --skill xmind
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FirenzeClaw/kimi-session-orchestrator

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for xmind

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firenzeclaw/kimi-session-orchestrator/xmind/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/firenzeclaw/kimi-session-orchestrator/xmind)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/firenzeclaw/kimi-session-orchestrator/xmind"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firenzeclaw/kimi-session-orchestrator/xmind/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for xmind

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/firenzeclaw/kimi-session-orchestrator/xmind"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firenzeclaw/kimi-session-orchestrator/xmind.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 53 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,399 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00053 $0.02399
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.01200
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00480
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00240

Measured 8d ago against content hash 11e8d062d422, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

xmind scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/xmind/SKILL.md · 190 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 190 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

XMIND — 困境梳理 + 新视角方案生成

概述

遇到困境时自动收集当前问题点与项目必读文档,打包交给独立子 Agent,该 Agent 从头理解项目全局后使用 zoom-out 退后一步,以宏观视角给出全新方案。方案被拒绝时,将拒绝原因注入交接包进入下一轮迭代,最多 3 轮。

核心原则: 困境中的 Agent 有思维惯性——它熟悉自己的解决方案,难以自我推翻。独立的新 Agent 不受此惯性约束。

何时使用

症状 示例
同一 bug 修了 2 次仍未解决 "又错了,再查一次……"
发现架构级矛盾但不知如何取舍 "这样改会破坏A,那样改会破坏B"
陷入细节无法判断优先级 "现在该先做哪个?"
需要全新视角审视方案 "有没有完全不同的思路?"

不适用: 单步操作(改一行配置)、已明确方案只需执行。

交接包 Schema(CRITICAL —— 单一事实来源)

子 Agent 工作流和交接包格式均以此 Schema 为准。必填字段缺失时拒绝传递,提示补全。

HandoffPackage {
  // 必填段
  project: {
    name: string            // required
    stack: string           // required, 语言/框架/工具链
    cwd: string             // required, 工作目录
  }
  docs: [{
    path: string            // required
    summary: string         // required, 一句话摘要
  }]                        // required, min 1

  problems: [{
    title: string           // required
    symptom: string         // required, 可观测现象
    attempts: [{
      solution: string      // required, 已尝试的方案
      why_failed: string    // required, 失败原因
    }]
    files: string[]         // 涉及的文件/模块列表
  }]                        // required, min 1

  constraints: {
    no_modify: string[]     // 不能修改的模块
    perf_floor: string      // 性能底线阈值
    compat: string          // 兼容性要求
  }                         // required

  // 迭代段(由反馈闭环自动填充)
  iteration: number          // 当前迭代轮次, 0=首次
  rejections: [{
    round: number
    proposal_title: string
    reason: string           // 用户拒绝原因
  }]

  // 子Agent工作流指令(从 SUBAGENT-WORKFLOW 注入)
  subagent_workflow: string  // required
}

// 验证规则
必填字段缺失 → 拒绝传递 → 提示 "HandoffPackage 验证失败: 缺少 [字段名]"
docs 长度 < 1  → 拒绝传递 → 提示 "至少提供 1 个必读文档"
problems 长度 < 1 → 拒绝传递 → 提示 "至少描述 1 个问题"

子 Agent 工作流指令(subagent_workflow 字段内容,从 SUBAGENT-WORKFLOW.md 注入):

请按以下步骤工作:
1. 通读 docs 中列出的所有必读文档,理解项目架构、约束和规范
2. 逐个分析 problems,理解为何已尝试的方案失败
3. 调用 zoom-out:绘制模块关系图,用项目术语描述全局架构
   - 若 zoom-out skill 不可用:手动绘制模块依赖图 + 用 constraints 中的术语描述全局
4. 基于宏观理解,提出 1-3 个新方案
5. 每个方案标注:
   - 可行性(高/中/低) + 理由
   - 风险
   - 与已尝试方案的本质区别(不能只是旧方案的微小变体)
6. 考虑 rejections 中的拒绝原因(如有),避免重复被拒绝的路径

Read the full file on GitHub · 190 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 190 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 11e8d062d422

Subscribe to this mod's changes

xmind is a skill published in the GitHub repository FirenzeClaw/kimi-session-orchestrator (0 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 2,399 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.