signal-integrity-review

signal-integrity-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from fireostendere/mcp_diptrace. It costs 93 tokens per session (1,067 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review workflow for checking PCB signal quality, including trace shape, board layers, return paths, and available simulation evidence.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review impedance and return paths on single-ended or differential traces, and to report when a requested analysis is unavailable.
Why use it?
It separates estimates from external simulations and prevents pass/fail claims when required board details or tools are missing.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review impedance and return paths on single-ended or differential traces, and to report when a requested analysis is unavailable.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/fireostendere/mcp_diptrace/signal-integrity-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add fireostendere/mcp_diptrace --skill signal-integrity-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fireostendere/mcp_diptrace

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for signal-integrity-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fireostendere/mcp_diptrace/signal-integrity-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fireostendere/mcp_diptrace/signal-integrity-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fireostendere/mcp_diptrace/signal-integrity-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fireostendere/mcp_diptrace/signal-integrity-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for signal-integrity-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fireostendere/mcp_diptrace/signal-integrity-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fireostendere/mcp_diptrace/signal-integrity-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 93 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,067 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00093 $0.01067
Opus 5.5 $0.00037 $0.00427
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00213
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00107

Measured 28d ago against content hash 9b126cf8e893, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

signal-integrity-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 28d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/signal-integrity-review/SKILL.md · 75 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Read runtime access before choosing between explicit-path MCP, a live bridge session, and native/headless CLI. Their availability is separate.

Signal-integrity review

RAG: engineering memory by default — shared workflow. Use the indexed transmission-line, grounding and EMC material to justify the model, assumptions and return-path checklist; solver output does not replace that basis.

Keep analytical equations, geometry heuristics, and external solver output in separate evidence classes. No result is fabrication sign-off. Use public tools/list for exact callable names and get_capabilities for document/configured feature and adapter availability.

Scope selection

  • microstrip: supported single-ended analytical model for an outer-layer trace.
  • differential_microstrip: supported coupled analytical model with explicit gap.
  • symmetric_stripline: supported single-ended analytical estimate within its published range.
  • Differential stripline: unavailable; return blocked_by_capability.
  • run_openems_stripline_analysis: a registered typed external adapter, not a bundled solver.
  • run_ngspice_simulation: a registered batch adapter for a caller-supplied netlist, not a PCB geometry extractor.

Workflow

  1. Call diptrace_status, get_capabilities, and get_document_info; freeze the PCB SHA-256.
  2. Read get_stackup and get_route_details. Require explicit net, layer, dielectric height/permittivity, copper width/thickness, reference conductor, and target/tolerance when a pass/fail judgment is requested.
  3. Use calculate_impedance for standalone inputs, analyze_stackup_for_impedance for complete outer-layer microstrip stackups, and validate_impedance_constraints for named routed nets.
  4. Use analyze_return_path only as a caller-radius geometry heuristic. Disclose boundary-only pour geometry, layer-transition ambiguity, and confidence limits. If native refill evidence is needed, use the PCB headless profile on a copy and retain its exported geometry and verdict; do not call all native work unavailable based on the MCP tool list. Even refilled geometry does not turn this heuristic into a field solution.
  5. Invoke ngspice/openEMS only when runtime discovery says the configured adapter is available. For openEMS retain request SHA-256, solver version, convergence, result SHA-256, and resources. For ngspice retain the netlist SHA-256, job status, return code/log summary, and resources; its current API exposes no executable version, convergence field, or result SHA-256, so record those fields as unavailable instead of inventing them.
  6. Emit ../shared/result.schema.json. Put impedance, effective permittivity, length/skew, frequency, and return-path coverage values in measurements, each with a unit, evidence class, and evidence IDs; do not hide numeric evidence in prose.

Read the full file on GitHub · 75 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 28d ago Changed · +41 tokens per session 9b126cf8e893
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines · +4 tokens per session eb6f4c49e03d
  3. 2mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A ef6bd0d430d8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

signal-integrity-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository fireostendere/mcp_diptrace (25 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 1,067 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

signal-integrity-review compared with skills from other repositories

signal-integrity-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
signal-integrity-reviewfireostendere/mcp_diptraceSkill2524d agoApache-2.0A93Claude Code, Codex
gke-compute-classesgoogle/skillsSkill22kyesterdayApache-2.0A83Claude Code, Codex
jetson-diagnosticNVIDIA/skillsSkill3.9kyesterdayApache-2.0A30Claude Code, Codex
holoscan-install-wheelNVIDIA/skillsSkill3.9kyesterdayApache-2.0A34Claude Code, Codex
offensive-z-waveSnailSploit/Claude-RedSkill10k25d agoMITA113Claude Code, Codex
doca-socket-relayNVIDIA/skillsSkill3.9kyesterdayApache-2.0A236Claude Code, Codex
hsb-flashNVIDIA/skillsSkill3.9kyesterdayApache-2.0B94Claude Code