Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/bug-reporternpx skills add Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge --skill bug-reportergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/bug-reporter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/bug-reporter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/bug-reporter.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00719 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00360 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
bug-reporter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bug Reporter
Produce clear, actionable, reproducible bug reports.
Bug Report Template
Every bug report follows this exact structure:
## BUG-<number>: <Short descriptive title>
**Severity:** Blocker / Critical / Major / Minor
**Module:** <module name from architecture>
**Spec Reference:** <requirement ID or spec section>
**Found During:** <test case ID or manual testing description>
### Reproduction Steps
**Preconditions:**
- [Required state, configuration, or setup]
**Steps:**
1. [Exact step]
2. [Exact step]
3. [Exact step — this triggers the bug]
### Expected Result
[What the spec says should happen, with spec section reference]
### Actual Result
[What actually happens]
**Evidence:**
- Error message: `<exact error text>`
- Log output: `<relevant log lines>`
- Test output: `<test failure details>`
### Environment
- OS: [if relevant]
- Runtime: [Node version, Rust toolchain, Python version]
- Configuration: [relevant config settings]
- Database state: [if relevant]
### Analysis
**Likely root cause:** [Brief assessment if obvious, "Unknown" if not]
**Related bugs:** [BUG-XXX if related]
**Workaround:** [If one exists, describe it. Otherwise "None known."]
Severity Classification
Blocker
- Application crashes or won't start
- Data loss or corruption
- Core user flow completely broken (can't login, can't save)
- Security bypass (flag to Zero as well)
Critical
- Major feature doesn't work
- No workaround available
- Affects majority of users
- Spec requirement completely unmet
Major
- Feature partially broken
- Workaround exists but is inconvenient
- Affects specific user scenarios
- Edge case in a core flow
Minor
- Cosmetic or display issue
- Typo in user-facing text
- Non-critical edge case
- Unexpected but harmless behavior
Bug Numbering
Within a QA pass, bugs are numbered sequentially: BUG-001, BUG-002, etc. If re-testing after fixes, new bugs continue the sequence (BUG-005, BUG-006). Fixed bugs keep their original number — mark them as FIXED in the report.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 116 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 4e85181ed11c
bug-reporter is a skill published in the GitHub repository Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge (74 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 719 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-release-management
Comprehensive GitHub release orchestration with AI swarm coordination for automated versioning, testing, deployment, and rollback management.
flow-nexus-platform
Comprehensive Flow Nexus platform management - authentication, sandboxes, app deployment, payments, and challenges.
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination.
github-multi-repo
Multi-repository coordination, synchronization, and architecture management with AI swarm orchestration.
github-project-management
Comprehensive GitHub project management with swarm-coordinated issue tracking, project board automation, and sprint planning.
github-workflow-automation
Advanced GitHub Actions workflow automation with AI swarm coordination, intelligent CI/CD pipelines, and comprehensive repository management.